do "fold checks into iterate_and_advance()" right

the only case when we should skip the iterate_and_advance() guts
is when nothing's left in the iterator, _not_ just when requested
amount is 0.  Said guts will do nothing in the latter case anyway;
the problem we tried to deal with in the aforementioned commit is
that when there's nothing left *and* the amount requested is 0,
we might end up deferencing one iovec too many; the value we fetch
from there is discarded in that case, but theoretically it might
oops if the iovec array ends exactly at the end of page with the
next page not mapped.

Bailing out on zero size requested had an unexpected side effect -
zero-length segment in the beginning of iovec array ended up
throwing do_loop_readv_writev() into infinite spin; we do not
advance past the empty segment at all.  Reproducer is trivial:
echo '#include <sys/uio.h>' >a.c
echo 'main() {char c; struct iovec v[] = {{&c,0},{&c,1}}; readv(0,v,2);}' >>a.c
cc a.c && ./a.out </proc/uptime

which should end up with the process not hanging.  Probably ought to
go into LTP or xfstests...
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

lib/iov_iter.c

@@ -101,7 +101,7 @@
 #define iterate_and_advance(i, n, v, I, B, K) {			\
 	if (unlikely(i->count < n))				\
 		n = i->count;					\
-	if (n) {						\
+	if (i->count) {						\
 		size_t skip = i->iov_offset;			\
 		if (unlikely(i->type & ITER_BVEC)) {		\
 			const struct bio_vec *bvec;		\