locking/static_keys: Fix up the static keys documentation

Fix a few small mistakes in the static key documentation and
delete an unneeded sentence.
Suggested-by: NJason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com>
Signed-off-by: NJonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150914171105.511e1e21@lwn.netSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

Documentation/static-keys.txt

@@ -15,8 +15,8 @@ The updated API replacements are:
 
 DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_TRUE(key);
 DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(key);
-static_key_likely()
-static_key_unlikely()
+static_branch_likely()
+static_branch_unlikely()
 
 0) Abstract
 

include/linux/jump_label.h

@@ -21,8 +21,8 @@
  *
  * DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_TRUE(key);
  * DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(key);
- * static_key_likely()
- * static_key_unlikely()
+ * static_branch_likely()
+ * static_branch_unlikely()
  *
  * Jump labels provide an interface to generate dynamic branches using
  * self-modifying code. Assuming toolchain and architecture support, if we
@@ -45,12 +45,10 @@
  * statement, setting the key to true requires us to patch in a jump
  * to the out-of-line of true branch.
  *
- * In addtion to static_branch_{enable,disable}, we can also reference count
+ * In addition to static_branch_{enable,disable}, we can also reference count
  * the key or branch direction via static_branch_{inc,dec}. Thus,
  * static_branch_inc() can be thought of as a 'make more true' and
- * static_branch_dec() as a 'make more false'. The inc()/dec()
- * interface is meant to be used exclusively from the inc()/dec() for a given
- * key.
+ * static_branch_dec() as a 'make more false'.
  *
  * Since this relies on modifying code, the branch modifying functions
  * must be considered absolute slow paths (machine wide synchronization etc.).