提交 160a5b52 编写于 作者: P Peilin Ye 提交者: Zheng Zengkai

vsock: Set socket state back to SS_UNCONNECTED in vsock_connect_timeout()

stable inclusion
from stable-v5.10.138
commit 55fdefcb52c5485a357a4a9cbc4d4da34c021369
category: bugfix
bugzilla: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/issues/I60QFD

Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id=55fdefcb52c5485a357a4a9cbc4d4da34c021369

--------------------------------

commit a3e7b29e upstream.

Imagine two non-blocking vsock_connect() requests on the same socket.
The first request schedules @connect_work, and after it times out,
vsock_connect_timeout() sets *sock* state back to TCP_CLOSE, but keeps
*socket* state as SS_CONNECTING.

Later, the second request returns -EALREADY, meaning the socket "already
has a pending connection in progress", even though the first request has
already timed out.

As suggested by Stefano, fix it by setting *socket* state back to
SS_UNCONNECTED, so that the second request will return -ETIMEDOUT.
Suggested-by: NStefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
Fixes: d021c344 ("VSOCK: Introduce VM Sockets")
Reviewed-by: NStefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeilin Ye <peilin.ye@bytedance.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NZheng Zengkai <zhengzengkai@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: NWei Li <liwei391@huawei.com>
上级 5d548353
......@@ -1242,6 +1242,7 @@ static void vsock_connect_timeout(struct work_struct *work)
if (sk->sk_state == TCP_SYN_SENT &&
(sk->sk_shutdown != SHUTDOWN_MASK)) {
sk->sk_state = TCP_CLOSE;
sk->sk_socket->state = SS_UNCONNECTED;
sk->sk_err = ETIMEDOUT;
sk->sk_error_report(sk);
vsock_transport_cancel_pkt(vsk);
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册