提交 152f2531 编写于 作者: K Kirill Tkhai 提交者: David S. Miller

net: Remove rtnl_lock() in nf_ct_iterate_destroy()

rtnl_lock() doesn't protect net::ct::count,
and it's not needed for__nf_ct_unconfirmed_destroy()
and for nf_queue_nf_hook_drop().
Signed-off-by: NKirill Tkhai <ktkhai@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
上级 ec9c7809
......@@ -1763,7 +1763,6 @@ nf_ct_iterate_destroy(int (*iter)(struct nf_conn *i, void *data), void *data)
{
struct net *net;
rtnl_lock();
down_read(&net_rwsem);
for_each_net(net) {
if (atomic_read(&net->ct.count) == 0)
......@@ -1772,7 +1771,6 @@ nf_ct_iterate_destroy(int (*iter)(struct nf_conn *i, void *data), void *data)
nf_queue_nf_hook_drop(net);
}
up_read(&net_rwsem);
rtnl_unlock();
/* Need to wait for netns cleanup worker to finish, if its
* running -- it might have deleted a net namespace from
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册