x86/alternative: Optimize single-byte NOPs at an arbitrary position
stable inclusion from stable-v5.10.133 commit 76474a9dd34a7a33abc82952b82f7092750f3bdc category: bugfix bugzilla: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/issues/I5PTAS CVE: CVE-2022-29900,CVE-2022-23816,CVE-2022-29901 Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id=76474a9dd34a7a33abc82952b82f7092750f3bdc -------------------------------- commit 2b31e8ed upstream. Up until now the assumption was that an alternative patching site would have some instructions at the beginning and trailing single-byte NOPs (0x90) padding. Therefore, the patching machinery would go and optimize those single-byte NOPs into longer ones. However, this assumption is broken on 32-bit when code like hv_do_hypercall() in hyperv_init() would use the ratpoline speculation killer CALL_NOSPEC. The 32-bit version of that macro would align certain insns to 16 bytes, leading to the compiler issuing a one or more single-byte NOPs, depending on the holes it needs to fill for alignment. That would lead to the warning in optimize_nops() to fire: ------------[ cut here ]------------ Not a NOP at 0xc27fb598 WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 0 at arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c:211 optimize_nops.isra.13 due to that function verifying whether all of the following bytes really are single-byte NOPs. Therefore, carve out the NOP padding into a separate function and call it for each NOP range beginning with a single-byte NOP. Fixes: 23c1ad53 ("x86/alternatives: Optimize optimize_nops()") Reported-by: NRichard Narron <richard@aaazen.com> Signed-off-by: NBorislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Acked-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213301 Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210601212125.17145-1-bp@alien8.deSigned-off-by: NBen Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLin Yujun <linyujun809@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: NZhang Jianhua <chris.zjh@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NZheng Zengkai <zhengzengkai@huawei.com>
Showing
想要评论请 注册 或 登录