scsi: scsi_transport_srp: Don't block target in SRP_PORT_LOST state
stable inclusion from stable-5.10.32 commit c836374bacfa5093a50cd2ecb650e9517fc06914 bugzilla: 51796 -------------------------------- [ Upstream commit 5cd0f6f5 ] rport_dev_loss_timedout() sets the rport state to SRP_PORT_LOST and the SCSI target state to SDEV_TRANSPORT_OFFLINE. If this races with srp_reconnect_work(), a warning is printed: Mar 27 18:48:07 ictm1604s01h4 kernel: dev_loss_tmo expired for SRP port-18:1 / host18. Mar 27 18:48:07 ictm1604s01h4 kernel: ------------[ cut here ]------------ Mar 27 18:48:07 ictm1604s01h4 kernel: scsi_internal_device_block(18:0:0:100) failed: ret = -22 Mar 27 18:48:07 ictm1604s01h4 kernel: Call Trace: Mar 27 18:48:07 ictm1604s01h4 kernel: ? scsi_target_unblock+0x50/0x50 [scsi_mod] Mar 27 18:48:07 ictm1604s01h4 kernel: starget_for_each_device+0x80/0xb0 [scsi_mod] Mar 27 18:48:07 ictm1604s01h4 kernel: target_block+0x24/0x30 [scsi_mod] Mar 27 18:48:07 ictm1604s01h4 kernel: device_for_each_child+0x57/0x90 Mar 27 18:48:07 ictm1604s01h4 kernel: srp_reconnect_rport+0xe4/0x230 [scsi_transport_srp] Mar 27 18:48:07 ictm1604s01h4 kernel: srp_reconnect_work+0x40/0xc0 [scsi_transport_srp] Avoid this by not trying to block targets for rports in SRP_PORT_LOST state. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210401091105.8046-1-mwilck@suse.comReviewed-by: NBart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org> Signed-off-by: NMartin Wilck <mwilck@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NMartin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NSasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NChen Jun <chenjun102@huawei.com> Acked-by: NWeilong Chen <chenweilong@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NZheng Zengkai <zhengzengkai@huawei.com>
Showing
想要评论请 注册 或 登录