perf/core: Fix sideband list-iteration vs. event ordering NULL pointer deference crash
Vegard Nossum reported that perf fuzzing generates a NULL pointer dereference crash: > Digging a bit deeper into this, it seems the event itself is getting > created by perf_event_open() and it gets added to the pmu_event_list > through: > > perf_event_open() > - perf_event_alloc() > - account_event() > - account_pmu_sb_event() > - attach_sb_event() > > so at this point the event is being attached but its ->ctx is still > NULL. It seems like ->ctx is set just a bit later in > perf_event_open(), though. > > But before that, __schedule() comes along and creates a stack trace > similar to the one above: > > __schedule() > - __perf_event_task_sched_out() > - perf_iterate_sb() > - perf_iterate_sb_cpu() > - event_filter_match() > - perf_cgroup_match() > - __get_cpu_context() > - (dereference ctx which is NULL) > > So I guess the question is... should the event be attached (= put on > the list) before ->ctx gets set? Or should the cgroup code check for a > NULL ->ctx? The latter seems like the simplest solution. Moving the list-add later creates a bit of a mess. Reported-by: NVegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@gmail.com> Tested-by: NVegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@gmail.com> Tested-by: NVince Weaver <vincent.weaver@maine.edu> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Cc: David Carrillo-Cisneros <davidcc@google.com> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> Cc: Kan Liang <kan.liang@intel.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Fixes: f2fb6bef ("perf/core: Optimize side-band event delivery") Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160804123724.GN6862@twins.programming.kicks-ass.netSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Showing
想要评论请 注册 或 登录