提交 09153000 编写于 作者: D Daniel Vetter

drm/i915: rework locking for intel_dpio|sbi_read|write

Spinning for up to 200 us with interrupts locked out is not good. So
let's just spin (and even that seems to be excessive).

And we don't call these functions from interrupt context, so this is
not required. Besides that doing anything in interrupt contexts which
might take a few hundred us is a no-go. So just convert the entire
thing to a mutex. Also move the mutex-grabbing out of the read/write
functions (add a WARN_ON(!is_locked)) instead) since all callers are
nicely grouped together.

Finally the real motivation for this change: Dont grab the modeset
mutex in the dpio debugfs file, we don't need that consistency. And
correctness of the dpio interface is ensured with the dpio_lock.
Reviewed-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
上级 20afbda2
......@@ -1633,7 +1633,7 @@ static int i915_dpio_info(struct seq_file *m, void *data)
return 0;
}
ret = mutex_lock_interruptible(&dev->mode_config.mutex);
ret = mutex_lock_interruptible(&dev_priv->dpio_lock);
if (ret)
return ret;
......@@ -1662,7 +1662,7 @@ static int i915_dpio_info(struct seq_file *m, void *data)
seq_printf(m, "DPIO_FASTCLK_DISABLE: 0x%08x\n",
intel_dpio_read(dev_priv, DPIO_FASTCLK_DISABLE));
mutex_unlock(&dev->mode_config.mutex);
mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->dpio_lock);
return 0;
}
......
......@@ -1599,7 +1599,7 @@ int i915_driver_load(struct drm_device *dev, unsigned long flags)
spin_lock_init(&dev_priv->irq_lock);
spin_lock_init(&dev_priv->error_lock);
spin_lock_init(&dev_priv->rps.lock);
spin_lock_init(&dev_priv->dpio_lock);
mutex_init(&dev_priv->dpio_lock);
mutex_init(&dev_priv->rps.hw_lock);
......
......@@ -686,7 +686,7 @@ typedef struct drm_i915_private {
struct pm_qos_request pm_qos;
/* DPIO indirect register protection */
spinlock_t dpio_lock;
struct mutex dpio_lock;
/** Cached value of IMR to avoid reads in updating the bitfield */
u32 pipestat[2];
......
......@@ -416,13 +416,11 @@ static const intel_limit_t intel_limits_vlv_dp = {
u32 intel_dpio_read(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, int reg)
{
unsigned long flags;
u32 val = 0;
WARN_ON(!mutex_is_locked(&dev_priv->dpio_lock));
spin_lock_irqsave(&dev_priv->dpio_lock, flags);
if (wait_for_atomic_us((I915_READ(DPIO_PKT) & DPIO_BUSY) == 0, 100)) {
DRM_ERROR("DPIO idle wait timed out\n");
goto out_unlock;
return 0;
}
I915_WRITE(DPIO_REG, reg);
......@@ -430,24 +428,20 @@ u32 intel_dpio_read(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, int reg)
DPIO_BYTE);
if (wait_for_atomic_us((I915_READ(DPIO_PKT) & DPIO_BUSY) == 0, 100)) {
DRM_ERROR("DPIO read wait timed out\n");
goto out_unlock;
return 0;
}
val = I915_READ(DPIO_DATA);
out_unlock:
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev_priv->dpio_lock, flags);
return val;
return I915_READ(DPIO_DATA);
}
static void intel_dpio_write(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, int reg,
u32 val)
{
unsigned long flags;
WARN_ON(!mutex_is_locked(&dev_priv->dpio_lock));
spin_lock_irqsave(&dev_priv->dpio_lock, flags);
if (wait_for_atomic_us((I915_READ(DPIO_PKT) & DPIO_BUSY) == 0, 100)) {
DRM_ERROR("DPIO idle wait timed out\n");
goto out_unlock;
return;
}
I915_WRITE(DPIO_DATA, val);
......@@ -456,9 +450,6 @@ static void intel_dpio_write(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, int reg,
DPIO_BYTE);
if (wait_for_atomic_us((I915_READ(DPIO_PKT) & DPIO_BUSY) == 0, 100))
DRM_ERROR("DPIO write wait timed out\n");
out_unlock:
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev_priv->dpio_lock, flags);
}
static void vlv_init_dpio(struct drm_device *dev)
......@@ -1455,13 +1446,12 @@ static void intel_disable_pll(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, enum pipe pipe)
static void
intel_sbi_write(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, u16 reg, u32 value)
{
unsigned long flags;
WARN_ON(!mutex_is_locked(&dev_priv->dpio_lock));
spin_lock_irqsave(&dev_priv->dpio_lock, flags);
if (wait_for((I915_READ(SBI_CTL_STAT) & SBI_BUSY) == 0,
100)) {
DRM_ERROR("timeout waiting for SBI to become ready\n");
goto out_unlock;
return;
}
I915_WRITE(SBI_ADDR,
......@@ -1475,24 +1465,19 @@ intel_sbi_write(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, u16 reg, u32 value)
if (wait_for((I915_READ(SBI_CTL_STAT) & (SBI_BUSY | SBI_RESPONSE_FAIL)) == 0,
100)) {
DRM_ERROR("timeout waiting for SBI to complete write transaction\n");
goto out_unlock;
return;
}
out_unlock:
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev_priv->dpio_lock, flags);
}
static u32
intel_sbi_read(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, u16 reg)
{
unsigned long flags;
u32 value = 0;
WARN_ON(!mutex_is_locked(&dev_priv->dpio_lock));
spin_lock_irqsave(&dev_priv->dpio_lock, flags);
if (wait_for((I915_READ(SBI_CTL_STAT) & SBI_BUSY) == 0,
100)) {
DRM_ERROR("timeout waiting for SBI to become ready\n");
goto out_unlock;
return 0;
}
I915_WRITE(SBI_ADDR,
......@@ -1504,14 +1489,10 @@ intel_sbi_read(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, u16 reg)
if (wait_for((I915_READ(SBI_CTL_STAT) & (SBI_BUSY | SBI_RESPONSE_FAIL)) == 0,
100)) {
DRM_ERROR("timeout waiting for SBI to complete read transaction\n");
goto out_unlock;
return 0;
}
value = I915_READ(SBI_DATA);
out_unlock:
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev_priv->dpio_lock, flags);
return value;
return I915_READ(SBI_DATA);
}
/**
......@@ -2924,6 +2905,8 @@ static void lpt_program_iclkip(struct drm_crtc *crtc)
u32 divsel, phaseinc, auxdiv, phasedir = 0;
u32 temp;
mutex_lock(&dev_priv->dpio_lock);
/* It is necessary to ungate the pixclk gate prior to programming
* the divisors, and gate it back when it is done.
*/
......@@ -3005,6 +2988,8 @@ static void lpt_program_iclkip(struct drm_crtc *crtc)
udelay(24);
I915_WRITE(PIXCLK_GATE, PIXCLK_GATE_UNGATE);
mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->dpio_lock);
}
/*
......@@ -4222,6 +4207,8 @@ static void vlv_update_pll(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
bool is_sdvo;
u32 temp;
mutex_lock(&dev_priv->dpio_lock);
is_sdvo = intel_pipe_has_type(crtc, INTEL_OUTPUT_SDVO) ||
intel_pipe_has_type(crtc, INTEL_OUTPUT_HDMI);
......@@ -4305,6 +4292,8 @@ static void vlv_update_pll(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
temp |= (1 << 21);
intel_dpio_write(dev_priv, DPIO_DATA_CHANNEL2, temp);
}
mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->dpio_lock);
}
static void i9xx_update_pll(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册