提交 07e10308 编写于 作者: C Chuck Lever 提交者: Anna Schumaker

xprtrdma: Prevent leak of rpcrdma_rep objects

If a reply has been processed but the RPC is later retransmitted
anyway, the req->rl_reply field still contains the only pointer to
the old rpcrdma rep. When the next reply comes in, the reply handler
will stomp on the rl_reply field, leaking the old rep.

A trace event is added to capture such leaks.

This problem seems to be worsened by the restructuring of the RPC
Call path in v4.20. Fully addressing this issue will require at
least a re-architecture of the disconnect logic, which is not
appropriate during -rc.
Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
上级 9aeaf8cf
......@@ -1065,6 +1065,34 @@ TRACE_EVENT(xprtrdma_cb_setup,
DEFINE_CB_EVENT(xprtrdma_cb_call);
DEFINE_CB_EVENT(xprtrdma_cb_reply);
TRACE_EVENT(xprtrdma_leaked_rep,
TP_PROTO(
const struct rpc_rqst *rqst,
const struct rpcrdma_rep *rep
),
TP_ARGS(rqst, rep),
TP_STRUCT__entry(
__field(unsigned int, task_id)
__field(unsigned int, client_id)
__field(u32, xid)
__field(const void *, rep)
),
TP_fast_assign(
__entry->task_id = rqst->rq_task->tk_pid;
__entry->client_id = rqst->rq_task->tk_client->cl_clid;
__entry->xid = be32_to_cpu(rqst->rq_xid);
__entry->rep = rep;
),
TP_printk("task:%u@%u xid=0x%08x rep=%p",
__entry->task_id, __entry->client_id, __entry->xid,
__entry->rep
)
);
/**
** Server-side RPC/RDMA events
**/
......
......@@ -1350,6 +1350,10 @@ void rpcrdma_reply_handler(struct rpcrdma_rep *rep)
}
req = rpcr_to_rdmar(rqst);
if (req->rl_reply) {
trace_xprtrdma_leaked_rep(rqst, req->rl_reply);
rpcrdma_recv_buffer_put(req->rl_reply);
}
req->rl_reply = rep;
rep->rr_rqst = rqst;
clear_bit(RPCRDMA_REQ_F_PENDING, &req->rl_flags);
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册