提交 0787843a 编写于 作者: J Jens Axboe 提交者: Zheng Zengkai

io_uring: convert io_buffer_idr to XArray

mainline inclusion
from mainline-v5.12-rc4
commit 9e15c3a0
category: bugfix
bugzilla: 50492
CVE: NA
Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=9e15c3a0ced5a61f320b989072c24983cb1620c1

---------------------------

Like we did for the personality idr, convert the IO buffer idr to use
XArray. This avoids a use-after-free on removal of entries, since idr
doesn't like doing so from inside an iterator, and it nicely reduces
the amount of code we need to support this feature.

Fixes: 5a2e745d ("io_uring: buffer registration infrastructure")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: yangerkun <yangerkun@huawei.com>
Reported-by: NHulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

Conflicts:
	fs/io_uring.c
Signed-off-by: Nyangerkun <yangerkun@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Nzhangyi (F) <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: NChen Jun <chenjun102@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: NZheng Zengkai <zhengzengkai@huawei.com>
上级 a22906e5
......@@ -344,7 +344,7 @@ struct io_ring_ctx {
struct socket *ring_sock;
#endif
struct idr io_buffer_idr;
struct xarray io_buffers;
struct xarray personalities;
u32 pers_next;
......@@ -1212,7 +1212,7 @@ static struct io_ring_ctx *io_ring_ctx_alloc(struct io_uring_params *p)
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ctx->cq_overflow_list);
init_completion(&ctx->ref_comp);
init_completion(&ctx->sq_thread_comp);
idr_init(&ctx->io_buffer_idr);
xa_init_flags(&ctx->io_buffers, XA_FLAGS_ALLOC1);
xa_init_flags(&ctx->personalities, XA_FLAGS_ALLOC1);
mutex_init(&ctx->uring_lock);
init_waitqueue_head(&ctx->wait);
......@@ -2989,7 +2989,7 @@ static struct io_buffer *io_buffer_select(struct io_kiocb *req, size_t *len,
lockdep_assert_held(&req->ctx->uring_lock);
head = idr_find(&req->ctx->io_buffer_idr, bgid);
head = xa_load(&req->ctx->io_buffers, bgid);
if (head) {
if (!list_empty(&head->list)) {
kbuf = list_last_entry(&head->list, struct io_buffer,
......@@ -2997,7 +2997,7 @@ static struct io_buffer *io_buffer_select(struct io_kiocb *req, size_t *len,
list_del(&kbuf->list);
} else {
kbuf = head;
idr_remove(&req->ctx->io_buffer_idr, bgid);
xa_erase(&req->ctx->io_buffers, bgid);
}
if (*len > kbuf->len)
*len = kbuf->len;
......@@ -3959,7 +3959,7 @@ static int __io_remove_buffers(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, struct io_buffer *buf,
}
i++;
kfree(buf);
idr_remove(&ctx->io_buffer_idr, bgid);
xa_erase(&ctx->io_buffers, bgid);
return i;
}
......@@ -3977,7 +3977,7 @@ static int io_remove_buffers(struct io_kiocb *req, bool force_nonblock,
lockdep_assert_held(&ctx->uring_lock);
ret = -ENOENT;
head = idr_find(&ctx->io_buffer_idr, p->bgid);
head = xa_load(&ctx->io_buffers, p->bgid);
if (head)
ret = __io_remove_buffers(ctx, head, p->bgid, p->nbufs);
if (ret < 0)
......@@ -4062,21 +4062,14 @@ static int io_provide_buffers(struct io_kiocb *req, bool force_nonblock,
lockdep_assert_held(&ctx->uring_lock);
list = head = idr_find(&ctx->io_buffer_idr, p->bgid);
list = head = xa_load(&ctx->io_buffers, p->bgid);
ret = io_add_buffers(p, &head);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
if (!list) {
ret = idr_alloc(&ctx->io_buffer_idr, head, p->bgid, p->bgid + 1,
GFP_KERNEL);
if (ret < 0) {
if (ret >= 0 && !list) {
ret = xa_insert(&ctx->io_buffers, p->bgid, head, GFP_KERNEL);
if (ret < 0)
__io_remove_buffers(ctx, head, p->bgid, -1U);
goto out;
}
}
out:
if (ret < 0)
req_set_fail_links(req);
......@@ -8388,19 +8381,13 @@ static int io_eventfd_unregister(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
return -ENXIO;
}
static int __io_destroy_buffers(int id, void *p, void *data)
{
struct io_ring_ctx *ctx = data;
struct io_buffer *buf = p;
__io_remove_buffers(ctx, buf, id, -1U);
return 0;
}
static void io_destroy_buffers(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
{
idr_for_each(&ctx->io_buffer_idr, __io_destroy_buffers, ctx);
idr_destroy(&ctx->io_buffer_idr);
struct io_buffer *buf;
unsigned long index;
xa_for_each(&ctx->io_buffers, index, buf)
__io_remove_buffers(ctx, buf, index, -1U);
}
static void io_ring_ctx_free(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册