提交 06f877d6 编写于 作者: E Eric Dumazet 提交者: David S. Miller

tcp/dccp: fix other lockdep splats accessing ireq_opt

In my first attempt to fix the lockdep splat, I forgot we could
enter inet_csk_route_req() with a freshly allocated request socket,
for which refcount has not yet been elevated, due to complex
SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU rules.

We either are in rcu_read_lock() section _or_ we own a refcount on the
request.

Correct RCU verb to use here is rcu_dereference_check(), although it is
not possible to prove we actually own a reference on a shared
refcount :/

In v2, I added ireq_opt_deref() helper and use in three places, to fix other
possible splats.

[   49.844590]  lockdep_rcu_suspicious+0xea/0xf3
[   49.846487]  inet_csk_route_req+0x53/0x14d
[   49.848334]  tcp_v4_route_req+0xe/0x10
[   49.850174]  tcp_conn_request+0x31c/0x6a0
[   49.851992]  ? __lock_acquire+0x614/0x822
[   49.854015]  tcp_v4_conn_request+0x5a/0x79
[   49.855957]  ? tcp_v4_conn_request+0x5a/0x79
[   49.858052]  tcp_rcv_state_process+0x98/0xdcc
[   49.859990]  ? sk_filter_trim_cap+0x2f6/0x307
[   49.862085]  tcp_v4_do_rcv+0xfc/0x145
[   49.864055]  ? tcp_v4_do_rcv+0xfc/0x145
[   49.866173]  tcp_v4_rcv+0x5ab/0xaf9
[   49.868029]  ip_local_deliver_finish+0x1af/0x2e7
[   49.870064]  ip_local_deliver+0x1b2/0x1c5
[   49.871775]  ? inet_del_offload+0x45/0x45
[   49.873916]  ip_rcv_finish+0x3f7/0x471
[   49.875476]  ip_rcv+0x3f1/0x42f
[   49.876991]  ? ip_local_deliver_finish+0x2e7/0x2e7
[   49.878791]  __netif_receive_skb_core+0x6d3/0x950
[   49.880701]  ? process_backlog+0x7e/0x216
[   49.882589]  __netif_receive_skb+0x1d/0x5e
[   49.884122]  process_backlog+0x10c/0x216
[   49.885812]  net_rx_action+0x147/0x3df

Fixes: a6ca7abe ("tcp/dccp: fix lockdep splat in inet_csk_route_req()")
Fixes: c92e8c02 ("tcp/dccp: fix ireq->opt races")
Signed-off-by: NEric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Reported-by: Nkernel test robot <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Reported-by: NMaciej Żenczykowski <maze@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
上级 a0c0865f
......@@ -132,6 +132,12 @@ static inline int inet_request_bound_dev_if(const struct sock *sk,
return sk->sk_bound_dev_if;
}
static inline struct ip_options_rcu *ireq_opt_deref(const struct inet_request_sock *ireq)
{
return rcu_dereference_check(ireq->ireq_opt,
refcount_read(&ireq->req.rsk_refcnt) > 0);
}
struct inet_cork {
unsigned int flags;
__be32 addr;
......
......@@ -495,7 +495,7 @@ static int dccp_v4_send_response(const struct sock *sk, struct request_sock *req
ireq->ir_rmt_addr);
err = ip_build_and_send_pkt(skb, sk, ireq->ir_loc_addr,
ireq->ir_rmt_addr,
rcu_dereference(ireq->ireq_opt));
ireq_opt_deref(ireq));
err = net_xmit_eval(err);
}
......
......@@ -543,8 +543,8 @@ struct dst_entry *inet_csk_route_req(const struct sock *sk,
struct ip_options_rcu *opt;
struct rtable *rt;
opt = rcu_dereference_protected(ireq->ireq_opt,
refcount_read(&req->rsk_refcnt) > 0);
opt = ireq_opt_deref(ireq);
flowi4_init_output(fl4, ireq->ir_iif, ireq->ir_mark,
RT_CONN_FLAGS(sk), RT_SCOPE_UNIVERSE,
sk->sk_protocol, inet_sk_flowi_flags(sk),
......
......@@ -877,7 +877,7 @@ static int tcp_v4_send_synack(const struct sock *sk, struct dst_entry *dst,
err = ip_build_and_send_pkt(skb, sk, ireq->ir_loc_addr,
ireq->ir_rmt_addr,
rcu_dereference(ireq->ireq_opt));
ireq_opt_deref(ireq));
err = net_xmit_eval(err);
}
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册