提交 066bb8d0 编写于 作者: P Paul E. McKenney 提交者: Linus Torvalds

[PATCH] fix remaining list_for_each_safe_rcu in -mm (take 2)

I missed a use of list_for_each_rcu_safe() in -mm tree.  Here is an updated
patch to fix it.  This time tested on a machine that actually uses IPMI...
(Thanks to Serge Hallyn for spotting this.)
Signed-off-by: N"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Corey Minyard <minyard@acm.org>
Cc: Matt Domsch <Matt_Domsch@dell.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
上级 81684ee6
......@@ -787,7 +787,6 @@ int ipmi_destroy_user(ipmi_user_t user)
int i;
unsigned long flags;
struct cmd_rcvr *rcvr;
struct list_head *entry1, *entry2;
struct cmd_rcvr *rcvrs = NULL;
user->valid = 1;
......@@ -812,8 +811,7 @@ int ipmi_destroy_user(ipmi_user_t user)
* synchronize_rcu()) then free everything in that list.
*/
down(&intf->cmd_rcvrs_lock);
list_for_each_safe_rcu(entry1, entry2, &intf->cmd_rcvrs) {
rcvr = list_entry(entry1, struct cmd_rcvr, link);
list_for_each_entry_rcu(rcvr, &intf->cmd_rcvrs, link) {
if (rcvr->user == user) {
list_del_rcu(&rcvr->link);
rcvr->next = rcvrs;
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册