提交 0526947f 编写于 作者: K Kirill Tkhai 提交者: David S. Miller

net: Move IP_ROUTER_ALERT out of lock_sock(sk)

ip_ra_control() does not need sk_lock. Who are the another
users of ip_ra_chain? ip_mroute_setsockopt() doesn't take
sk_lock, while parallel IP_ROUTER_ALERT syscalls are
synchronized by ip_ra_lock. So, we may move this command
out of sk_lock.
Signed-off-by: NKirill Tkhai <ktkhai@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
上级 76d3e153
......@@ -647,6 +647,8 @@ static int do_ip_setsockopt(struct sock *sk, int level,
/* If optlen==0, it is equivalent to val == 0 */
if (optname == IP_ROUTER_ALERT)
return ip_ra_control(sk, val ? 1 : 0, NULL);
if (ip_mroute_opt(optname))
return ip_mroute_setsockopt(sk, optname, optval, optlen);
......@@ -1157,9 +1159,6 @@ static int do_ip_setsockopt(struct sock *sk, int level,
goto e_inval;
inet->mc_all = val;
break;
case IP_ROUTER_ALERT:
err = ip_ra_control(sk, val ? 1 : 0, NULL);
break;
case IP_FREEBIND:
if (optlen < 1)
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册