提交 04eac7ff 编写于 作者: G Glauber Costa 提交者: Linus Torvalds

rescounter: remove __must_check from res_counter_charge_nofail()

Since we will succeed with the allocation no matter what, there isn't a
need to use __must_check with it.  It can very well be optional.
Signed-off-by: NGlauber Costa <glommer@parallels.com>
Signed-off-by: NKAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Ying Han <yinghan@google.com>
Reviewed-by: NTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
上级 2f3479b1
......@@ -119,7 +119,7 @@ int __must_check res_counter_charge_locked(struct res_counter *counter,
unsigned long val, bool force);
int __must_check res_counter_charge(struct res_counter *counter,
unsigned long val, struct res_counter **limit_fail_at);
int __must_check res_counter_charge_nofail(struct res_counter *counter,
int res_counter_charge_nofail(struct res_counter *counter,
unsigned long val, struct res_counter **limit_fail_at);
/*
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册