mm/page_alloc.c: delete or fix duplicated words

Drop the repeated word "them" and "that".
Change "the the" to "to the".
Signed-off-by: NRandy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Reviewed-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Reviewed-by: NZi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200801173822.14973-10-rdunlap@infradead.orgSigned-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

mm/page_alloc.c

@@ -4282,7 +4282,7 @@ __alloc_pages_direct_reclaim(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order,
 	/*
 	 * If an allocation failed after direct reclaim, it could be because
 	 * pages are pinned on the per-cpu lists or in high alloc reserves.
-	 * Shrink them them and try again
+	 * Shrink them and try again
 	 */
 	if (!page && !drained) {
 		unreserve_highatomic_pageblock(ac, false);
@@ -6192,7 +6192,7 @@ static int zone_batchsize(struct zone *zone)
  * locking.
  *
  * Any new users of pcp->batch and pcp->high should ensure they can cope with
- * those fields changing asynchronously (acording the the above rule).
+ * those fields changing asynchronously (acording to the above rule).
  *
  * mutex_is_locked(&pcp_batch_high_lock) required when calling this function
  * outside of boot time (or some other assurance that no concurrent updaters
@@ -8203,7 +8203,7 @@ void *__init alloc_large_system_hash(const char *tablename,
  * race condition. So you can't expect this function should be exact.
  *
  * Returns a page without holding a reference. If the caller wants to
- * dereference that page (e.g., dumping), it has to make sure that that it
+ * dereference that page (e.g., dumping), it has to make sure that it
  * cannot get removed (e.g., via memory unplug) concurrently.
  *
  */