xfs: straighten out all the naming around incore inode tree walks

We're not very consistent about function names for the incore inode
iteration function.  Turn them all into xfs_inode_walk* variants.
Signed-off-by: NDarrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: NBrian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>

fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c

@@ -767,12 +767,12 @@ xfs_icache_inode_is_allocated(
  * ignore it.
  */
 STATIC bool
-xfs_inode_ag_walk_grab(
+xfs_inode_walk_ag_grab(
 	struct xfs_inode	*ip,
 	int			flags)
 {
 	struct inode		*inode = VFS_I(ip);
-	bool			newinos = !!(flags & XFS_AGITER_INEW_WAIT);
+	bool			newinos = !!(flags & XFS_INODE_WALK_INEW_WAIT);
 
 	ASSERT(rcu_read_lock_held());
 
@@ -816,7 +816,7 @@ xfs_inode_ag_walk_grab(
  * inodes with the given radix tree @tag.
  */
 STATIC int
-xfs_inode_ag_walk(
+xfs_inode_walk_ag(
 	struct xfs_mount	*mp,
 	struct xfs_perag	*pag,
 	int			(*execute)(struct xfs_inode *ip, void *args),
@@ -864,7 +864,7 @@ xfs_inode_ag_walk(
 		for (i = 0; i < nr_found; i++) {
 			struct xfs_inode *ip = batch[i];
 
-			if (done || !xfs_inode_ag_walk_grab(ip, iter_flags))
+			if (done || !xfs_inode_walk_ag_grab(ip, iter_flags))
 				batch[i] = NULL;
 
 			/*
@@ -892,7 +892,7 @@ xfs_inode_ag_walk(
 		for (i = 0; i < nr_found; i++) {
 			if (!batch[i])
 				continue;
-			if ((iter_flags & XFS_AGITER_INEW_WAIT) &&
+			if ((iter_flags & XFS_INODE_WALK_INEW_WAIT) &&
 			    xfs_iflags_test(batch[i], XFS_INEW))
 				xfs_inew_wait(batch[i]);
 			error = execute(batch[i], args);
@@ -937,7 +937,7 @@ xfs_inode_walk_get_perag(
  * @tag.
  */
 int
-xfs_inode_ag_iterator(
+xfs_inode_walk(
 	struct xfs_mount	*mp,
 	int			iter_flags,
 	int			(*execute)(struct xfs_inode *ip, void *args),
@@ -952,7 +952,7 @@ xfs_inode_ag_iterator(
 	ag = 0;
 	while ((pag = xfs_inode_walk_get_perag(mp, ag, tag))) {
 		ag = pag->pag_agno + 1;
-		error = xfs_inode_ag_walk(mp, pag, execute, args, tag,
+		error = xfs_inode_walk_ag(mp, pag, execute, args, tag,
 				iter_flags);
 		xfs_perag_put(pag);
 		if (error) {
@@ -1548,7 +1548,7 @@ xfs_icache_free_eofblocks(
 	struct xfs_mount	*mp,
 	struct xfs_eofblocks	*eofb)
 {
-	return xfs_inode_ag_iterator(mp, 0, xfs_inode_free_eofblocks, eofb,
+	return xfs_inode_walk(mp, 0, xfs_inode_free_eofblocks, eofb,
 			XFS_ICI_EOFBLOCKS_TAG);
 }
 
@@ -1798,7 +1798,7 @@ xfs_icache_free_cowblocks(
 	struct xfs_mount	*mp,
 	struct xfs_eofblocks	*eofb)
 {
-	return xfs_inode_ag_iterator(mp, 0, xfs_inode_free_cowblocks, eofb,
+	return xfs_inode_walk(mp, 0, xfs_inode_free_cowblocks, eofb,
 			XFS_ICI_COWBLOCKS_TAG);
 }
 

fs/xfs/xfs_icache.h

@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ struct xfs_eofblocks {
  * tags for inode radix tree
  */
 #define XFS_ICI_NO_TAG		(-1)	/* special flag for an untagged lookup
-					   in xfs_inode_ag_iterator */
+					   in xfs_inode_walk */
 #define XFS_ICI_RECLAIM_TAG	0	/* inode is to be reclaimed */
 #define XFS_ICI_EOFBLOCKS_TAG	1	/* inode has blocks beyond EOF */
 #define XFS_ICI_COWBLOCKS_TAG	2	/* inode can have cow blocks to gc */
@@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ struct xfs_eofblocks {
 /*
  * flags for AG inode iterator
  */
-#define XFS_AGITER_INEW_WAIT	0x1	/* wait on new inodes */
+#define XFS_INODE_WALK_INEW_WAIT	0x1	/* wait on new inodes */
 
 int xfs_iget(struct xfs_mount *mp, struct xfs_trans *tp, xfs_ino_t ino,
 	     uint flags, uint lock_flags, xfs_inode_t **ipp);
@@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ int xfs_inode_free_quota_cowblocks(struct xfs_inode *ip);
 void xfs_cowblocks_worker(struct work_struct *);
 void xfs_queue_cowblocks(struct xfs_mount *);
 
-int xfs_inode_ag_iterator(struct xfs_mount *mp, int iter_flags,
+int xfs_inode_walk(struct xfs_mount *mp, int iter_flags,
 	int (*execute)(struct xfs_inode *ip, void *args),
 	void *args, int tag);
 

fs/xfs/xfs_qm_syscalls.c

@@ -781,6 +781,6 @@ xfs_qm_dqrele_all_inodes(
 	uint			flags)
 {
 	ASSERT(mp->m_quotainfo);
-	xfs_inode_ag_iterator(mp, XFS_AGITER_INEW_WAIT, xfs_dqrele_inode,
+	xfs_inode_walk(mp, XFS_INODE_WALK_INEW_WAIT, xfs_dqrele_inode,
 			&flags, XFS_ICI_NO_TAG);
 }