提交 032af1ce 编写于 作者: A Alan 提交者: Jeff Garzik

libata-core: Fix simplex handling

The initial simplex handling code is fooled if you suspend and resume.
This also causes problems with some single channel controllers which
claim to be simplex.

The fix is fairly simple, instead of keeping a flag to remember if we
gave away the simplex channel we remember the actual owner. As the owner
is always part of the host_set we don't even need a refcount.

Knowing the owner also means we can reassign simplex DMA channels in
future hotplug code etc if we need to
Signed-off-by: NAlan Cox <alan@redhat.com>
(and a signed-off for the patch I sent before while I remember)
Signed-off-by: NJeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
上级 562aa1d4
......@@ -2556,12 +2556,11 @@ int ata_set_mode(struct ata_port *ap, struct ata_device **r_failed_dev)
* host channels are not permitted to do so.
*/
if (used_dma && (ap->host->flags & ATA_HOST_SIMPLEX))
ap->host->simplex_claimed = 1;
ap->host->simplex_claimed = ap;
/* step5: chip specific finalisation */
if (ap->ops->post_set_mode)
ap->ops->post_set_mode(ap);
out:
if (rc)
*r_failed_dev = dev;
......@@ -3444,7 +3443,7 @@ static void ata_dev_xfermask(struct ata_device *dev)
"device is on DMA blacklist, disabling DMA\n");
}
if ((host->flags & ATA_HOST_SIMPLEX) && host->simplex_claimed) {
if ((host->flags & ATA_HOST_SIMPLEX) && host->simplex_claimed != ap) {
xfer_mask &= ~(ATA_MASK_MWDMA | ATA_MASK_UDMA);
ata_dev_printk(dev, KERN_WARNING, "simplex DMA is claimed by "
"other device, disabling DMA\n");
......
......@@ -403,8 +403,7 @@ struct ata_host {
void *private_data;
const struct ata_port_operations *ops;
unsigned long flags;
int simplex_claimed; /* Keep seperate in case we
ever need to do this locked */
struct ata_port *simplex_claimed; /* channel owning the DMA */
struct ata_port *ports[0];
};
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册