提交 0315a075 编写于 作者: A Alexander Lobakin 提交者: Jakub Kicinski

net: fix premature exit from NAPI state polling in napi_disable()

Commit 719c5719 ("net: make napi_disable() symmetric with
enable") accidentally introduced a bug sometimes leading to a kernel
BUG when bringing an iface up/down under heavy traffic load.

Prior to this commit, napi_disable() was polling n->state until
none of (NAPIF_STATE_SCHED | NAPIF_STATE_NPSVC) is set and then
always flip them. Now there's a possibility to get away with the
NAPIF_STATE_SCHE unset as 'continue' drops us to the cmpxchg()
call with an uninitialized variable, rather than straight to
another round of the state check.

Error path looks like:

napi_disable():
unsigned long val, new; /* new is uninitialized */

do {
	val = READ_ONCE(n->state); /* NAPIF_STATE_NPSVC and/or
				      NAPIF_STATE_SCHED is set */
	if (val & (NAPIF_STATE_SCHED | NAPIF_STATE_NPSVC)) { /* true */
		usleep_range(20, 200);
		continue; /* go straight to the condition check */
	}
	new = val | <...>
} while (cmpxchg(&n->state, val, new) != val); /* state == val, cmpxchg()
						  writes garbage */

napi_enable():
do {
	val = READ_ONCE(n->state);
	BUG_ON(!test_bit(NAPI_STATE_SCHED, &val)); /* 50/50 boom */
<...>

while the typical BUG splat is like:

[  172.652461] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[  172.652462] kernel BUG at net/core/dev.c:6937!
[  172.656914] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI
[  172.661966] CPU: 36 PID: 2829 Comm: xdp_redirect_cp Tainted: G          I       5.15.0 #42
[  172.670222] Hardware name: Intel Corporation S2600WFT/S2600WFT, BIOS SE5C620.86B.02.01.0014.082620210524 08/26/2021
[  172.680646] RIP: 0010:napi_enable+0x5a/0xd0
[  172.684832] Code: 07 49 81 cc 00 01 00 00 4c 89 e2 48 89 d8 80 e6 fb f0 48 0f b1 55 10 48 39 c3 74 10 48 8b 5d 10 f6 c7 04 75 3d f6 c3 01 75 b4 <0f> 0b 5b 5d 41 5c c3 65 ff 05 b8 e5 61 53 48 c7 c6 c0 f3 34 ad 48
[  172.703578] RSP: 0018:ffffa3c9497477a8 EFLAGS: 00010246
[  172.708803] RAX: ffffa3c96615a014 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: ffff8a4b575301a0
< snip >
[  172.782403] Call Trace:
[  172.784857]  <TASK>
[  172.786963]  ice_up_complete+0x6f/0x210 [ice]
[  172.791349]  ice_xdp+0x136/0x320 [ice]
[  172.795108]  ? ice_change_mtu+0x180/0x180 [ice]
[  172.799648]  dev_xdp_install+0x61/0xe0
[  172.803401]  dev_xdp_attach+0x1e0/0x550
[  172.807240]  dev_change_xdp_fd+0x1e6/0x220
[  172.811338]  do_setlink+0xee8/0x1010
[  172.814917]  rtnl_setlink+0xe5/0x170
[  172.818499]  ? bpf_lsm_binder_set_context_mgr+0x10/0x10
[  172.823732]  ? security_capable+0x36/0x50
< snip >

Fix this by replacing 'do { } while (cmpxchg())' with an "infinite"
for-loop with an explicit break.

From v1 [0]:
 - just use a for-loop to simplify both the fix and the existing
   code (Eric).

[0] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20211110191126.1214-1-alexandr.lobakin@intel.com

Fixes: 719c5719 ("net: make napi_disable() symmetric with enable")
Suggested-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> # for-loop
Signed-off-by: NAlexander Lobakin <alexandr.lobakin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NJesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NEric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211110195605.1304-1-alexandr.lobakin@intel.comSigned-off-by: NJakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
上级 e5d5aadc
......@@ -6928,7 +6928,7 @@ void napi_disable(struct napi_struct *n)
might_sleep();
set_bit(NAPI_STATE_DISABLE, &n->state);
do {
for ( ; ; ) {
val = READ_ONCE(n->state);
if (val & (NAPIF_STATE_SCHED | NAPIF_STATE_NPSVC)) {
usleep_range(20, 200);
......@@ -6937,7 +6937,10 @@ void napi_disable(struct napi_struct *n)
new = val | NAPIF_STATE_SCHED | NAPIF_STATE_NPSVC;
new &= ~(NAPIF_STATE_THREADED | NAPIF_STATE_PREFER_BUSY_POLL);
} while (cmpxchg(&n->state, val, new) != val);
if (cmpxchg(&n->state, val, new) == val)
break;
}
hrtimer_cancel(&n->timer);
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册