提交 001d50c9 编写于 作者: G Geert Uytterhoeven 提交者: Rafael J. Wysocki

PM / Domains: Remove obsolete "samsung,power-domain" check

Currently the generic PM Domain code code checks for the presence of
both (generic) "power-domains" and (Samsung Exynos legacy)
"samsung,power-domain" properties in all device tree nodes representing
devices.

There are two issues with this:
  1. This imposes a small boot-time penalty on all platforms using DT,
  2. Platform-specific checks do not really belong in core framework
     code.

Remove the platform-specific check, as the last user of
"samsung,power-domain" was removed in commit 46dcf0ff ("ARM:
dts: exynos: Remove exynos4415.dtsi").  All other users were converted
before in commit 0da65870 ("ARM: dts: convert to generic power
domain bindings for exynos DT").
Signed-off-by: NGeert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Acked-by: NUlf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Acked-by: NKrzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
上级 50c4c4e2
......@@ -2199,20 +2199,8 @@ int genpd_dev_pm_attach(struct device *dev)
ret = of_parse_phandle_with_args(dev->of_node, "power-domains",
"#power-domain-cells", 0, &pd_args);
if (ret < 0) {
if (ret != -ENOENT)
return ret;
/*
* Try legacy Samsung-specific bindings
* (for backwards compatibility of DT ABI)
*/
pd_args.args_count = 0;
pd_args.np = of_parse_phandle(dev->of_node,
"samsung,power-domain", 0);
if (!pd_args.np)
return -ENOENT;
}
if (ret < 0)
return ret;
mutex_lock(&gpd_list_lock);
pd = genpd_get_from_provider(&pd_args);
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册