Colin reports that there's unreachable code, since we only ever break
if ret == 0. This is correct, and is due to a reversed logic condition
in when to break or not.

Break out of the loop if we don't process any task work, in that case
we do want to return -EINTR.

Fixes: af9c1a44 ("io_uring: process task work in io_uring_register()")
Reported-by: NColin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>