-
由 Xiao Ni 提交于
One customer reports a crash problem which causes by flush request. It triggers a warning before crash. /* new request after previous flush is completed */ if (ktime_after(req_start, mddev->prev_flush_start)) { WARN_ON(mddev->flush_bio); mddev->flush_bio = bio; bio = NULL; } The WARN_ON is triggered. We use spin lock to protect prev_flush_start and flush_bio in md_flush_request. But there is no lock protection in md_submit_flush_data. It can set flush_bio to NULL first because of compiler reordering write instructions. For example, flush bio1 sets flush bio to NULL first in md_submit_flush_data. An interrupt or vmware causing an extended stall happen between updating flush_bio and prev_flush_start. Because flush_bio is NULL, flush bio2 can get the lock and submit to underlayer disks. Then flush bio1 updates prev_flush_start after the interrupt or extended stall. Then flush bio3 enters in md_flush_request. The start time req_start is behind prev_flush_start. The flush_bio is not NULL(flush bio2 hasn't finished). So it can trigger the WARN_ON now. Then it calls INIT_WORK again. INIT_WORK() will re-initialize the list pointers in the work_struct, which then can result in a corrupted work list and the work_struct queued a second time. With the work list corrupted, it can lead in invalid work items being used and cause a crash in process_one_work. We need to make sure only one flush bio can be handled at one same time. So add spin lock in md_submit_flush_data to protect prev_flush_start and flush_bio in an atomic way. Reviewed-by: NDavid Jeffery <djeffery@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NXiao Ni <xni@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NSong Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
dc5d17a3