-
由 Gustavo A. R. Silva 提交于
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through. Notice that in this particular case, I replaced the "fall-through:" comment with a proper "fall through", which is what GCC is expecting to find. Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1373880 ("Missing break in switch") Signed-off-by: NGustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com> Signed-off-by: NUlf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
d2681cd8