-
由 Al Viro 提交于
We can step on WARN_ON_ONCE() in sem_getref() if a semaphore is removed just as we are about to call sem_getref() from semctl_main(); results are not pretty. We should fail with -EIDRM, same as if IPC_RM happened while we'd been doing allocation there. This also expands sem_getref() at its only callsite (and fixed there), while sem_getref_and_unlock() is simply killed off - it has no callers at all. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Acked-by: NDavidlohr Bueso <davidlohr.bueso@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
ce857229