-
由 Dan Williams 提交于
When xfs is operating as the back-end of a pNFS block server, it prevents collisions between local and remote operations by requiring a lease to be held for remotely accessed blocks. Local filesystem operations break those leases before writing or mutating the extent map of the file. A similar mechanism is needed to prevent operations on pinned dax mappings, like device-DMA, from colliding with extent unmap operations. BREAK_WRITE and BREAK_UNMAP are introduced as two distinct levels of layout breaking. Layouts are broken in the BREAK_WRITE case to ensure that layout-holders do not collide with local writes. Additionally, layouts are broken in the BREAK_UNMAP case to make sure the layout-holder has a consistent view of the file's extent map. While BREAK_WRITE breaks can be satisfied be recalling FL_LAYOUT leases, BREAK_UNMAP breaks additionally require waiting for busy dax-pages to go idle while holding XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL. After this refactoring xfs_break_layouts() becomes the entry point for coordinating both types of breaks. Finally, xfs_break_leased_layouts() becomes just the BREAK_WRITE handler. Note that the unlock tracking is needed in a follow on change. That will coordinate retrying either break handler until both successfully test for a lease break while maintaining the lock state. Cc: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> Cc: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com> Reported-by: NDave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Reported-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Reviewed-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: NDan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
69eb5fa1