hulk inclusion
category: bugfix
bugzilla: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/issues/I5SR8X
CVE: NA

--------------------------------

======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
4.18.0+ #4 Tainted: G                 ---------r-  -
------------------------------------------------------
dmsetup/923 is trying to acquire lock:
000000008d8170dd (kn->count#184){++++}, at: kernfs_remove+0x24/0x40 fs/kernfs/dir.c:1354

but task is already holding lock:
000000003377330b (slab_mutex){+.+.}, at: kmem_cache_destroy+0xec/0x320 mm/slab_common.c:928

which lock already depends on the new lock.

the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

-> #1 (slab_mutex){+.+.}:
       __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:925 [inline]
       __mutex_lock+0x105/0x11a0 kernel/locking/mutex.c:1072
       slab_attr_store+0x6d/0xe0 mm/slub.c:5526
       sysfs_kf_write+0x10f/0x170 fs/sysfs/file.c:139
       kernfs_fop_write+0x290/0x440 fs/kernfs/file.c:316
       __vfs_write+0x81/0x100 fs/read_write.c:485
       vfs_write+0x184/0x4c0 fs/read_write.c:549
       ksys_write+0xc6/0x1a0 fs/read_write.c:598
       do_syscall_64+0xca/0x5a0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:298
       entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6a/0xdf

-> #0 (kn->count#184){++++}:
       lock_acquire+0x10f/0x340 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3868
       kernfs_drain fs/kernfs/dir.c:467 [inline]
       __kernfs_remove fs/kernfs/dir.c:1320 [inline]
       __kernfs_remove+0x6d0/0x890 fs/kernfs/dir.c:1279
       kernfs_remove+0x24/0x40 fs/kernfs/dir.c:1354
       sysfs_remove_dir+0xb6/0xf0 fs/sysfs/dir.c:99
       kobject_del.part.1+0x35/0xe0 lib/kobject.c:573
       kobject_del+0x1b/0x30 lib/kobject.c:569
       shutdown_cache+0x17f/0x310 mm/slab_common.c:592
       kmem_cache_destroy+0x263/0x320 mm/slab_common.c:943
       bio_put_slab block/bio.c:152 [inline]
       bioset_exit+0x20d/0x330 block/bio.c:1916
       cleanup_mapped_device+0x64/0x360 drivers/md/dm.c:1903
       free_dev+0xbc/0x240 drivers/md/dm.c:2058
       __dm_destroy+0x317/0x490 drivers/md/dm.c:2426
       dm_hash_remove_all+0x8f/0x250 drivers/md/dm-ioctl.c:314
       remove_all+0x4d/0x90 drivers/md/dm-ioctl.c:471
       ctl_ioctl+0x426/0x910 drivers/md/dm-ioctl.c:1870
       dm_ctl_ioctl+0x23/0x30 drivers/md/dm-ioctl.c:1892
       vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:46 [inline]
       file_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:509 [inline]
       do_vfs_ioctl+0x1a5/0x1100 fs/ioctl.c:696
       ksys_ioctl+0x7c/0xa0 fs/ioctl.c:713
       __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:720 [inline]
       __se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:718 [inline]
       __x64_sys_ioctl+0x74/0xb0 fs/ioctl.c:718
       do_syscall_64+0xca/0x5a0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:298
       entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6a/0xdf

other info that might help us debug this:

 Possible unsafe locking scenario:

       CPU0                    CPU1
       ----                    ----
  lock(slab_mutex);
                               lock(kn->count#184);
                               lock(slab_mutex);
  lock(kn->count#184);

A potential deadlock may occur when we remove and write a slab-attr-file in
/sys/kernfs/slab/xxx/ at the same time.
The lock sequence in remove process is:
slab_mutex --> kn->count
The lock sequence in write process is:
kn->count --> slab_mutex
This can be fixed by replacing mutex_lock with mutex_trylock in slab_attr_store.
Signed-off-by: NLi Lingfeng <lilingfeng3@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: NKefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: NYongqiang Liu <liuyongqiang13@huawei.com>