Commentary from Chris Wilson's original version:

> I was looking at some wait_for() timeouts on a slow system, with lots of
> debug enabled (KASAN, lockdep, mmio_debug). Thinking that we were
> mishandling the timeout, I tried to ensure that we loop at least once
> after first testing COND. However, the double test of COND either side
> of the timeout check makes that unlikely. But we can do an equivalent
> loop, that keeps the COND check after testing for timeout (required so
> that we are not preempted between testing COND and then testing for a
> timeout) without expanding COND twice.
>
> The advantage of only expanding COND once is a dramatic reduction in
> code size:
>
>    text	   data	    bss	    dec	    hex
>    1308733	   5184	   1152	1315069	 1410fd	before
>    1305341	   5184	   1152	1311677	 1403bd	after

but it turned out that due to a missing iniitialiser, gcc had "gone
wild trimming undefined code" :( This version acheives a rather more
modest (but still worthwhile) gain of ~550 bytes.
Signed-off-by: NDave Gordon <david.s.gordon@intel.com>
Original-idea-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Zanoni, Paulo R <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1473855033-26980-1-git-send-email-david.s.gordon@intel.comReviewed-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>