-
由 Lai Jiangshan 提交于
Because a local variable is not initialized, I got these when I did 'cat tracing/trace'. (not trace_pipe): CPU:0 [LOST 18446744071579453134 EVENTS] ps-3099 [000] 560.770221: lock_acquire: ffff880030865010 &(&dentry->d_lock)->rlock CPU:0 [LOST 18446744071579453134 EVENTS] ps-3099 [000] 560.770221: lock_release: ffff880030865010 &(&dentry->d_lock)->rlock CPU:0 [LOST 18446612133255294080 EVENTS] ps-3099 [000] 560.770221: lock_acquire: ffff880030865010 &(&dentry->d_lock)->rlock CPU:0 [LOST 18446744071579453134 EVENTS] ps-3099 [000] 560.770222: lock_release: ffff880030865010 &(&dentry->d_lock)->rlock CPU:0 [LOST 18446744071579453134 EVENTS] ps-3099 [000] 560.770222: lock_release: ffffffff816cfb98 dcache_lock See peek_next_entry(), it does not set *lost_events when we 'cat tracing/trace' Signed-off-by: NLai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com> LKML-Reference: <4BB9A929.2000303@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NSteven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
aa27497c