If mounts are deleted after a read(2) call on /proc/self/mounts (or its
kin), the subsequent read(2) could miss a mount that comes after the
deleted one in the list.  This is because the file position is interpreted
as the number mount entries from the start of the list.

E.g. first read gets entries #0 to #9; the seq file index will be 10.  Then
entry #5 is deleted, resulting in #10 becoming #9 and #11 becoming #10,
etc...  The next read will continue from entry #10, and #9 is missed.

Solve this by adding a cursor entry for each open instance.  Taking the
global namespace_sem for write seems excessive, since we are only dealing
with a per-namespace list.  Instead add a per-namespace spinlock and use
that together with namespace_sem taken for read to protect against
concurrent modification of the mount list.  This may reduce parallelism of
is_local_mountpoint(), but it's hardly a big contention point.  We could
also use RCU freeing of cursors to make traversal not need additional
locks, if that turns out to be neceesary.

Only move the cursor once for each read (cursor is not added on open) to
minimize cacheline invalidation.  When EOF is reached, the cursor is taken
off the list, in order to prevent an excessive number of cursors due to
inactive open file descriptors.
Reported-by: NKarel Zak <kzak@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NMiklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>