-
由 Adrian Hunter 提交于
Generally, it should be more efficient if filter_cpu() comes before machine__resolve() because filter_cpu() is much less code than machine__resolve(). Example: $ perf record --sample-cpu -- make -C tools/perf >/dev/null Before: $ perf stat -- perf script -C 0 >/dev/null Performance counter stats for 'perf script -C 0': 116.94 msec task-clock # 0.992 CPUs utilized 2 context-switches # 17.103 /sec 0 cpu-migrations # 0.000 /sec 8,187 page-faults # 70.011 K/sec 478,351,812 cycles # 4.091 GHz 564,785,464 instructions # 1.18 insn per cycle 114,341,105 branches # 977.789 M/sec 2,615,495 branch-misses # 2.29% of all branches 0.117840576 seconds time elapsed 0.085040000 seconds user 0.032396000 seconds sys After: $ perf stat -- perf script -C 0 >/dev/null Performance counter stats for 'perf script -C 0': 107.45 msec task-clock # 0.992 CPUs utilized 3 context-switches # 27.919 /sec 0 cpu-migrations # 0.000 /sec 7,964 page-faults # 74.117 K/sec 438,417,260 cycles # 4.080 GHz 522,571,855 instructions # 1.19 insn per cycle 105,187,488 branches # 978.921 M/sec 2,356,261 branch-misses # 2.24% of all branches 0.108282546 seconds time elapsed 0.095935000 seconds user 0.011991000 seconds sys Signed-off-by: NAdrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> Cc: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com> Cc: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210621150514.32159-2-adrian.hunter@intel.comSigned-off-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
9300041c