-
由 Daniel Vetter 提交于
Extract all this logic into a new helper function semaphore_wait_to_signaller_ring because: - The current code has way too much magic. - The current code doesn't look at bi16, which encodes VECS signallers on HSW. Those are just added after the fact, so can't be encoded in a neat formula. - The current logic can't blow up since it limits its value range sufficiently, but that's a bit too tricky to rely on in my opinion. Especially when we start to add bdw support. - I'm not a big fan of the explicit ring->semaphore_register list, but I think it's more robust to use the same mapping both when constructing the semaphore commands and when decoding them. - Finally add a FIXME comment about lack of broadwell support here, like in the earlier ipehr semaphore cmd detection function. Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com> Cc: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com> [danvet: Actually drop the untrue claim in the commit message Chris pointed out.] Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
921d42ea