-
由 NeilBrown 提交于
This lock is used for (slightly) more than helping with writing superblocks, and it will soon be extended further. So the name is inappropriate. Also, the _irq variant hasn't been needed since 2.6.37 as it is never taking from interrupt or bh context. So: -rename write_lock to lock -document what it protects -remove _irq ... except in md_flush_request() as there is no wait_event_lock() (with no _irq). This can be cleaned up after appropriate changes to wait.h. Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
85572d7c