Using a seqlock for devnet_rename_seq is not a good idea,
as device_rename() can sleep.

As we hold RTNL, we dont need a protection for writers,
and only need a seqcount so that readers can catch a change done
by a writer.

Bug added in commit c91f6df2 (sockopt: Change getsockopt() of
SO_BINDTODEVICE to return an interface name)
Reported-by: NDave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NEric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: Brian Haley <brian.haley@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>