get_scan_ratio() calculates percentage and if the percentage is < 1%, it
will round percentage down to 0% and cause we completely ignore scanning
anon/file pages to reclaim memory even the total anon/file pages are very
big.

To avoid underflow, we don't use percentage, instead we directly calculate
how many pages should be scaned.  In this way, we should get several
scanned pages for < 1% percent.

This has some benefits:

1. increase our calculation precision

2.  making our scan more smoothly.  Without this, if percent[x] is
   underflow, shrink_zone() doesn't scan any pages and suddenly it scans
   all pages when priority is zero.  With this, even priority isn't zero,
   shrink_zone() gets chance to scan some pages.

Note, this patch doesn't really change logics, but just increase
precision.  For system with a lot of memory, this might slightly changes
behavior.  For example, in a sequential file read workload, without the
patch, we don't swap any anon pages.  With it, if anon memory size is
bigger than 16G, we will see one anon page swapped.  The 16G is calculated
as PAGE_SIZE * priority(4096) * (fp/ap).  fp/ap is assumed to be 1024
which is common in this workload.  So the impact sounds not a big deal.
Signed-off-by: NShaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Acked-by: NRik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>