-
由 Mark Rutland 提交于
When we're updating a register's sys_val, we use arm64_ftr_value() to find the new field value. We use cpuid_feature_extract_field() to find the new value, but this implicitly assumes a 4-bit field, so we may extract more bits than we mean to for fields like CTR_EL0.L1ip. This affects update_cpu_ftr_reg(), where we may extract erroneous values for ftr_cur and ftr_new. Depending on the additional bits extracted in either case, we may erroneously detect that the value is mismatched, and we'll try to compute a new safe value. Dependent on these extra bits and feature type, arm64_ftr_safe_value() may pessimistically select the always-safe value, or may erroneously choose either the extracted cur or new value as the safe option. The extra bits will subsequently be masked out in arm64_ftr_set_value(), so we may choose a higher value, yet write back a lower one. Fix this by passing the width down explicitly in arm64_ftr_value(), so we always extract the correct amount. Signed-off-by: NMark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Reviewed-by: NSuzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
638f863d