-
由 Quentin Monnet 提交于
There are a number of alternative "make" invocations that can be used to compile bpftool. The following invocations are expected to work: - through the kbuild system, from the top of the repository (make tools/bpf) - by telling make to change to the bpftool directory (make -C tools/bpf/bpftool) - by building the BPF tools from tools/ (cd tools && make bpf) - by running make from bpftool directory (cd tools/bpf/bpftool && make) Additionally, setting the O or OUTPUT variables should tell the build system to use a custom output path, for each of these alternatives. The following patch fixes the following invocations: $ make tools/bpf $ make tools/bpf O=<dir> $ make -C tools/bpf/bpftool OUTPUT=<dir> $ make -C tools/bpf/bpftool O=<dir> $ cd tools/ && make bpf O=<dir> $ cd tools/bpf/bpftool && make OUTPUT=<dir> $ cd tools/bpf/bpftool && make O=<dir> After this commit, the build still fails for two variants when passing the OUTPUT variable: $ make tools/bpf OUTPUT=<dir> $ cd tools/ && make bpf OUTPUT=<dir> In order to remember and check what make invocations are supposed to work, and to document the ones which do not, a new script is added to the BPF selftests. Note that some invocations require the kernel to be configured, so the script skips them if no .config file is found. v2: - In make_and_clean(), set $ERROR to 1 when "make" returns non-zero, even if the binary was produced. - Run "make clean" from the correct directory (bpf/ instead of bpftool/, when relevant). Reported-by: NLorenz Bauer <lmb@cloudflare.com> Signed-off-by: NQuentin Monnet <quentin.monnet@netronome.com> Reviewed-by: NJakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
45c5589d