Tvrtko was looking through the execbuffer-ioctl and noticed that the
uABI was tightly coupled to our internal engine identifiers. Close
inspection also revealed that we leak those internal engine identifiers
through the busy-ioctl, and those internal identifiers already do not
match the user identifiers. Fortuitiously, there is only one user of the
set of busy rings from the busy-ioctl, and they only wish to choose
between the RENDER and the BLT engines.

Let's fix the userspace ABI while we still can.

v2: Update the uAPI documentation to explain the identifiers.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Testcase: igt/gem_busy
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Acked-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1452876706-21620-1-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk