Most of the drivers do following in their ->target_index() routines:

	struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
	freqs.old = old freq...
	freqs.new = new freq...

	cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);

	/* Change rate here */

	cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);

This is replicated over all cpufreq drivers today and there doesn't exists a
good enough reason why this shouldn't be moved to cpufreq core instead.

There are few special cases though, like exynos5440, which doesn't do everything
on the call to ->target_index() routine and call some kind of bottom halves for
doing this work, work/tasklet/etc..

They may continue doing notification from their own code as flag:
CPUFREQ_ASYNC_NOTIFICATION is already set for them.

All drivers are also modified in this patch to avoid breaking 'git bisect', as
double notification would happen otherwise.
Acked-by: NHans-Christian Egtvedt <egtvedt@samfundet.no>
Acked-by: NJesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@axis.com>
Acked-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Acked-by: NRussell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Acked-by: NStephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: NAndrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Tested-by: NNicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: NLan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>