I was being overly paranoid in not updating the execobject.offset after
performing the fallback copy where we set reloc.presumed_offset to -1.
The thinking was to ensure that a subsequent NORELOC execbuf would be
forced to process the invalid relocations. However this is overkill so
long as we *only* update the execobject.offset following a successful
update of the relocation value witin the batch. If we have to repeat the
execbuf due to a later interruption, then we may skip the relocations on
the second pass (honouring NORELOC) since the execobject.offset match
the actual offsets (even though reloc.presumed_offset is garbage).

Subsequent calls to execbuf with NORELOC should themselves ensure that
the reloc.presumed_offset have been corrected in case of future
migration.

Reporting back the actual execobject.offset, even when
reloc.presumed_offset is garbage, ensures that reuse of those objects
use the latest information to avoid relocations.

Fixes: 2889caa9 ("drm/i915: Eliminate lots of iterations over the execobjects array")
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101635Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170721145037.25105-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.ukReviewed-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>