This patch implements per hash bucket locking for the frag queue
hash.  This removes two write locks, and the only remaining write
lock is for protecting hash rebuild.  This essentially reduce the
readers-writer lock to a rebuild lock.

This patch is part of "net: frag performance followup"
 http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.network/263644
of which two patches have already been accepted:

Same test setup as previous:
 (http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.network/257155)
 Two 10G interfaces, on seperate NUMA nodes, are under-test, and uses
 Ethernet flow-control.  A third interface is used for generating the
 DoS attack (with trafgen).

Notice, I have changed the frag DoS generator script to be more
efficient/deadly.  Before it would only hit one RX queue, now its
sending packets causing multi-queue RX, due to "better" RX hashing.

Test types summary (netperf UDP_STREAM):
 Test-20G64K     == 2x10G with 65K fragments
 Test-20G3F      == 2x10G with 3x fragments (3*1472 bytes)
 Test-20G64K+DoS == Same as 20G64K with frag DoS
 Test-20G3F+DoS  == Same as 20G3F  with frag DoS
 Test-20G64K+MQ  == Same as 20G64K with Multi-Queue frag DoS
 Test-20G3F+MQ   == Same as 20G3F  with Multi-Queue frag DoS

When I rebased this-patch(03) (on top of net-next commit a210576c) and
removed the _bh spinlock, I saw a performance regression.  BUT this
was caused by some unrelated change in-between.  See tests below.

Test (A) is what I reported before for patch-02, accepted in commit 1b5ab0de.
Test (B) verifying-retest of commit 1b5ab0de corrospond to patch-02.
Test (C) is what I reported before for this-patch

Test (D) is net-next master HEAD (commit a210576c), which reveals some
(unknown) performance regression (compared against test (B)).
Test (D) function as a new base-test.

Performance table summary (in Mbit/s):

(#) Test-type:  20G64K    20G3F    20G64K+DoS  20G3F+DoS  20G64K+MQ 20G3F+MQ
    ----------  -------   -------  ----------  ---------  --------  -------
(A) Patch-02  : 18848.7   13230.1   4103.04     5310.36     130.0    440.2
(B) 1b5ab0de  : 18841.5   13156.8   4101.08     5314.57     129.0    424.2
(C) Patch-03v1: 18838.0   13490.5   4405.11     6814.72     196.6    461.6

(D) a210576c  : 18321.5   11250.4   3635.34     5160.13     119.1    405.2
(E) with _bh  : 17247.3   11492.6   3994.74     6405.29     166.7    413.6
(F) without bh: 17471.3   11298.7   3818.05     6102.11     165.7    406.3

Test (E) and (F) is this-patch(03), with(V1) and without(V2) the _bh spinlocks.

I cannot explain the slow down for 20G64K (but its an artificial
"lab-test" so I'm not worried).  But the other results does show
improvements.  And test (E) "with _bh" version is slightly better.
Signed-off-by: NJesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
Acked-by: NHannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org>
Acked-by: NEric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>

----
V2:
- By analysis from Hannes Frederic Sowa and Eric Dumazet, we don't
  need the spinlock _bh versions, as Netfilter currently does a
  local_bh_disable() before entering inet_fragment.
- Fold-in desc from cover-mail
V3:
- Drop the chain_len counter per hash bucket.
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>