-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Notice that when cpufreq_policy_restore() is called, its per-CPU cpufreq_cpu_data variable has been already dereferenced and if that variable is not NULL, the policy local pointer in cpufreq_add_dev() contains its value. Therefore it is not necessary to dereference it again and the policy pointer can be used directly. Moreover, if that pointer is not NULL, the policy is inactive (or the previous check would have made us return from cpufreq_add_dev()) so the restoration code from cpufreq_policy_restore() can be moved to that point in cpufreq_add_dev(). Do that and drop cpufreq_policy_restore(). Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
11ce707e