-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
The single largest factor in the overhead of parsing the commands is the setup of the virtual mapping to provide a continuous block for the batch buffer. If we keep those vmappings around (against the better judgement of mm/vmalloc.c, which we offset by handwaving and looking suggestively at the shrinker) we can dramatically improve the performance of the parser for small batches (such as media workloads). Furthermore, we can use the prepare shmem read/write functions to determine how best we need to clflush the range (rather than every page of the object). The impact of caching both src/dst vmaps is +80% on ivb and +140% on byt for the throughput on small batches. (Caching just the dst vmap and iterating over the src, doing a page by page copy is roughly 5% slower on both platforms. That may be an acceptable trade-off to eliminate one cached vmapping, and we may be able to reduce the per-page copying overhead further.) For *this* simple test case, the cmdparser is now within a factor of 2 of ideal performance. Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.william.auld@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: NMatthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20160818161718.27187-33-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
0b537272