-
由 eric miao 提交于
Reasons: 1. straight forward: the name "LCD_COLOR_DSTN_16BPP" is much better than "LCCR0_Pas | LCCR0_Color | LCCR0_Dual" 2. by defining LCD connection types as constants, it allows only valid possibilities 3. by removing the dependency of register bits definitions, those can be later moved into the body of pxafb.c, instead of having a regs-lcd.h around Currently, only lubbock, mainstone, zylonite and littleton have been modified to support these types (see coming patches after this). Other platforms are encouraged to change their way describing the LCD controller connections. Signed-off-by: Neric miao <eric.miao@marvell.com> Cc: "Antonino A. Daplas" <adaplas@pol.net> Cc: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
84f43c30