At this point, no plugin support exists in Avocado. This is in
preparation for the new plugin code to be cleanly introduced.

The plugins that play a role in the plugin architecture have
been removed, since they wouldn't be functional under the new
plugin management code. The ones that are add extra functionality
to Avocado have been kept, and will be ported to the new
architecture.

Also, most of the functional tests have been temporarily disabled.
The reason is that most of them run avocado, which depends on the
run command, which in turn, depends on the plugin archicture code.
Signed-off-by: NCleber Rosa <crosa@redhat.com>

While going through the dependency list (requirements*.txt files) and
performing our self tests out of virtual environments, I noticed that
some tests are run outside the virtual environments.

The reason is that, even though the virtual environment is activated
for the test session (and say, `which python` gives `/venv/bin/python`),
we have hard coded `/usr/bin/python` in most places.

According to the some discussions on the virtualenv project itself[1],
a quick solution is to revert to the also common `/usr/bin/env python`
way of pointing to the Python interpreter.

[1] - https://github.com/pypa/virtualenv/issues/124Signed-off-by: NCleber Rosa <crosa@redhat.com>

Make sure we have avocado_ + __name__ prefixes to the dirs
created with tempfile, so that we have an easy way to spot
when we are not cleaning up directories properly. This mostly
concerns unittests, although the kernel_build lib and the
iso9660 lib also uses that API.
Signed-off-by: NLucas Meneghel Rodrigues <lmr@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NLucas Meneghel Rodrigues <lmr@redhat.com>

Fedora 21 ships psutils 0.6, that has the API psutil.get_pid_list()
instead of psutil.pids(). Let's make both compatible, for the sake
of running unittests on COPR builds.
Signed-off-by: NLucas Meneghel Rodrigues <lmr@redhat.com>

If between psutil.procs() and the instantiation of the Process
object the given pid has terminated, we'll get a NoSuchProcess
error from psutils. Let's expand the list comprehension to avoid
getting caught by such a condition.
Signed-off-by: NLucas Meneghel Rodrigues <lmr@redhat.com>

Even though I may be the one to blame about coming up with this
"simple import magic", I believe it was a mistake and we should get
rid of them.

There are a couple of other ways to actually do development out of
of a source tree, including running unittests that do not require
this amount of boiler plate code. Examples include just setting
the PYTHONPATH environment variable to actually run (setuptools based)
`python setup.py develop`.

The little bits of what looks like the import magic that was left, is
not really import magic. It's just that functional tests need to locate
the Avocado source tree base directory to run the test runner from it.
Signed-off-by: NCleber Rosa <crosa@redhat.com>

When running this functional test with the standard unittest
discovery/runner it produces output that conflicts with the runner
output.

It looks like this output is not necessary for the test itself, and
not that helpful for debugging purposes, so, let's just silence it.
Signed-off-by: NCleber Rosa <crosa@redhat.com>

To be honest, our test code could still be kept in the same directories and
have the same names. But I think we can improve two things here:

1) Flatten a little bit the directory structure of selftests. Two path
components are being dropped here: "all" and "avocado". So that
"selftests/all/functional/avocado" becomes simply
"selftests/functional".

2) File names match what is, by default, recognized by unittest (the
Standard Library module) based discovery of tests. That means that
doc_build_test.py becomes test_doc_build.py. Not a big deal IMHO.
Signed-off-by: NCleber Rosa <crosa@redhat.com>

Add functional automated tests for the Ctrl+C feature.
They use aexpect and psutil, so add their dependencies
to the relevant requirement files.
Signed-off-by: NLucas Meneghel Rodrigues <lmr@redhat.com>