1. 15 12月, 2010 1 次提交
    • T
      7000559: G1: assertion failure !outer || (full_collections_started ==... · 49b4b500
      tonyp 提交于
      7000559: G1: assertion failure !outer || (full_collections_started == _full_collections_completed + 1)
      Summary: The concurrent marking thread can complete its operation and increment the full GC counter during a Full GC. This causes the nesting of increments to the start and end of Full GCs that we are expecting to be wrong. the fix is for the marking thread to join the suspendible thread set before incrementing the counter so that it's blocked until the Full GC (or any other safepoint) is finished. The change also includes some minor code cleanup (I renamed a parameter).
      Reviewed-by: brutisso, ysr
      49b4b500
  2. 10 12月, 2010 1 次提交
  3. 08 12月, 2010 1 次提交
  4. 03 12月, 2010 1 次提交
  5. 02 12月, 2010 1 次提交
  6. 24 11月, 2010 1 次提交
  7. 17 11月, 2010 1 次提交
    • J
      6978187: G1: assert(ParallelGCThreads> 1 || n_yielded() == _hrrs->occupied()) strikes again · 8d02802f
      johnc 提交于
      Summary: An evacuation failure while copying the roots caused an object, A, to be forwarded to itself. During the subsequent RSet updating a reference to A was processed causing the reference to be added to the RSet of A's heap region. As a result of adding to the remembered set we ran into the issue described in 6930581 - the sparse table expanded and the RSet scanning code walked the cards in one instance of RHashTable (_cur) while the occupied() counts the cards in the expanded table (_next).
      Reviewed-by: tonyp, iveresov
      8d02802f
  8. 14 10月, 2010 1 次提交
  9. 13 10月, 2010 2 次提交
  10. 02 10月, 2010 1 次提交
    • J
      6983311: G1: LoopTest hangs when run with -XX:+ExplicitInvokesConcurrent · 52b8d7bd
      johnc 提交于
      Summary: Clear the concurrent marking "in progress" flag while the FullGCCount_lock is held. This avoids a race that can cause back to back System.gc() calls, when ExplicitGCInvokesConcurrent is enabled, to fail to initiate a marking cycle causing the requesting thread to hang.
      Reviewed-by: tonyp, ysr
      52b8d7bd
  11. 21 9月, 2010 1 次提交
  12. 26 8月, 2010 1 次提交
  13. 25 8月, 2010 1 次提交
    • T
      6974966: G1: unnecessary direct-to-old allocations · 41dac17c
      tonyp 提交于
      Summary: This change revamps the slow allocation path of G1. Improvements include the following: a) Allocations directly to old regions are now totally banned. G1 now only allows allocations out of young regions (with the only exception being humongous regions). b) The thread that allocates a new region (which is now guaranteed to be young) does not dirty all its cards. Each thread that successfully allocates out of a young region is now responsible for dirtying the cards that corresponding to the "block" that just got allocated. c) allocate_new_tlab() and mem_allocate() are now implemented differently and TLAB allocations are only done by allocate_new_tlab(). d) If a thread schedules an evacuation pause in order to satisfy an allocation request, it will perform the allocation at the end of the safepoint so that the thread that initiated the GC also gets "first pick" of any space made available by the GC. e) If a thread is unable to allocate a humongous object it will schedule an evacuation pause in case it reclaims enough regions so that the humongous allocation can be satisfied aftewards. f) The G1 policy is more careful to set the young list target length to be the survivor number +1. g) Lots of code tidy up, removal, refactoring to make future changes easier.
      Reviewed-by: johnc, ysr
      41dac17c
  14. 18 8月, 2010 3 次提交
  15. 09 8月, 2010 1 次提交
  16. 05 8月, 2010 1 次提交
    • T
      6963209: G1: remove the concept of abandoned pauses · e49283a2
      tonyp 提交于
      Summary: As part of 6944166 we disabled the concept of abandoned pauses (i.e., if the collection set is empty, we would still try to do a pause even if it is to update the RSets and scan the roots). This changeset removes the code and structures associated with abandoned pauses.
      Reviewed-by: iveresov, johnc
      e49283a2
  17. 03 8月, 2010 1 次提交
    • J
      6814437: G1: remove the _new_refs array · 64711cc9
      johnc 提交于
      Summary: The per-worker _new_refs array is used to hold references that point into the collection set. It is populated during RSet updating and subsequently processed. In the event of an evacuation failure it processed again to recreate the RSets of regions in the collection set. Remove the per-worker _new_refs array by processing the references directly. Use a DirtyCardQueue to hold the cards containing the references so that the RSets of regions in the collection set can be recreated when handling an evacuation failure.
      Reviewed-by: iveresov, jmasa, tonyp
      64711cc9
  18. 20 7月, 2010 1 次提交
  19. 29 6月, 2010 1 次提交
  20. 28 5月, 2010 2 次提交
  21. 19 5月, 2010 1 次提交
  22. 15 5月, 2010 1 次提交
  23. 23 4月, 2010 2 次提交
  24. 16 4月, 2010 3 次提交
  25. 08 4月, 2010 1 次提交
    • J
      6940894: G1: assert(new_obj != 0 || ... "should be forwarded") for compaction tests · bc7497dc
      johnc 提交于
      Summary: Humongous regions may contain multiple objects as a result of being retained as to-space from a previous GC and then re-used as to-space after being tagged as humongous. These changes include a check that causes retained to-space regions that are now tagged as humongous to be disregarded and a new to-space region allocated.
      Reviewed-by: tonyp, iveresov
      bc7497dc
  26. 06 4月, 2010 1 次提交
    • T
      6909756: G1: guarantee(G1CollectedHeap::heap()->mark_in_progress(),"Precondition.") · 524b2dd2
      tonyp 提交于
      Summary: Make sure that two marking cycles do not overlap, i.e., a new one can only start after the concurrent marking thread finishes all its work. In the fix I piggy-back a couple of minor extra fixes: some general code reformatting for consistency (only around the code I modified), the removal of a field (G1CollectorPolicy::_should_initiate_conc_mark) which doesn't seem to be used at all (it's only set but never read), as well as moving the "is GC locker active" test earlier into the G1 pause / Full GC and using a more appropriate method for it.
      Reviewed-by: johnc, jmasa, jcoomes, ysr
      524b2dd2
  27. 31 3月, 2010 1 次提交
  28. 14 4月, 2010 1 次提交
  29. 12 3月, 2010 1 次提交
    • J
      6755988: G1: assert(new_obj != 0 || ... "should be forwarded") · 195509ea
      johnc 提交于
      Summary: A TLAB became large enough to be considered a humongous object allowing multiple objects to be allocated in a humongous region, which violates a basic assumption about humongous regions. The changes ensure that TLABs cannot be regarded as humongous.
      Reviewed-by: iveresov, tonyp
      195509ea
  30. 24 2月, 2010 1 次提交
  31. 12 2月, 2010 1 次提交
    • I
      6923991: G1: improve scalability of RSet scanning · 88955d77
      iveresov 提交于
      Summary: Implemented block-based work stealing. Moved copying during the rset scanning phase to the main copying phase. Made the size of rset table depend on the region size.
      Reviewed-by: apetrusenko, tonyp
      88955d77
  32. 02 2月, 2010 1 次提交
    • Y
      6904516: More object array barrier fixes, following up on 6906727 · 59ae9b34
      ysr 提交于
      Summary: Fixed missing pre-barrier calls for G1, modified C1 to call pre- and correct post-barrier interfaces, deleted obsolete interface, (temporarily) disabled redundant deferred barrier in BacktraceBuilder.
      Reviewed-by: coleenp, jmasa, kvn, never
      59ae9b34
  33. 14 1月, 2010 1 次提交
    • Y
      6896647: card marks can be deferred too long · 651edb8d
      ysr 提交于
      Summary: Deferred card marks are now flushed during the gc prologue. Parallel[Scavege,OldGC] and SerialGC no longer defer card marks generated by COMPILER2 as a result of ReduceInitialCardMarks. For these cases, introduced a diagnostic option to defer the card marks, only for the purposes of testing and diagnostics. CMS and G1 continue to defer card marks. Potential performance concern related to single-threaded flushing of deferred card marks in the gc prologue will be addressed in the future.
      Reviewed-by: never, johnc
      651edb8d