提交 8bb934e4 编写于 作者: I iveresov

8017065: C2 allows safepoint checks to leak into G1 pre-barriers

Summary: Make all raw loads strictly respect control dependencies, make sure RCE doesn't move raw loads, add verification of G1 pre-barriers.
Reviewed-by: kvn, roland
上级 d8f57254
......@@ -848,6 +848,7 @@ Compile::Compile( ciEnv* ci_env, C2Compiler* compiler, ciMethod* target, int osr
}
#endif
NOT_PRODUCT( verify_barriers(); )
// Now that we know the size of all the monitors we can add a fixed slot
// for the original deopt pc.
......@@ -3368,6 +3369,72 @@ void Compile::verify_graph_edges(bool no_dead_code) {
}
}
}
// Verify GC barriers consistency
// Currently supported:
// - G1 pre-barriers (see GraphKit::g1_write_barrier_pre())
void Compile::verify_barriers() {
if (UseG1GC) {
// Verify G1 pre-barriers
const int marking_offset = in_bytes(JavaThread::satb_mark_queue_offset() + PtrQueue::byte_offset_of_active());
ResourceArea *area = Thread::current()->resource_area();
Unique_Node_List visited(area);
Node_List worklist(area);
// We're going to walk control flow backwards starting from the Root
worklist.push(_root);
while (worklist.size() > 0) {
Node* x = worklist.pop();
if (x == NULL || x == top()) continue;
if (visited.member(x)) {
continue;
} else {
visited.push(x);
}
if (x->is_Region()) {
for (uint i = 1; i < x->req(); i++) {
worklist.push(x->in(i));
}
} else {
worklist.push(x->in(0));
// We are looking for the pattern:
// /->ThreadLocal
// If->Bool->CmpI->LoadB->AddP->ConL(marking_offset)
// \->ConI(0)
// We want to verify that the If and the LoadB have the same control
// See GraphKit::g1_write_barrier_pre()
if (x->is_If()) {
IfNode *iff = x->as_If();
if (iff->in(1)->is_Bool() && iff->in(1)->in(1)->is_Cmp()) {
CmpNode *cmp = iff->in(1)->in(1)->as_Cmp();
if (cmp->Opcode() == Op_CmpI && cmp->in(2)->is_Con() && cmp->in(2)->bottom_type()->is_int()->get_con() == 0
&& cmp->in(1)->is_Load()) {
LoadNode* load = cmp->in(1)->as_Load();
if (load->Opcode() == Op_LoadB && load->in(2)->is_AddP() && load->in(2)->in(2)->Opcode() == Op_ThreadLocal
&& load->in(2)->in(3)->is_Con()
&& load->in(2)->in(3)->bottom_type()->is_intptr_t()->get_con() == marking_offset) {
Node* if_ctrl = iff->in(0);
Node* load_ctrl = load->in(0);
if (if_ctrl != load_ctrl) {
// Skip possible CProj->NeverBranch in infinite loops
if ((if_ctrl->is_Proj() && if_ctrl->Opcode() == Op_CProj)
&& (if_ctrl->in(0)->is_MultiBranch() && if_ctrl->in(0)->Opcode() == Op_NeverBranch)) {
if_ctrl = if_ctrl->in(0)->in(0);
}
}
assert(load_ctrl != NULL && if_ctrl == load_ctrl, "controls must match");
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
#endif
// The Compile object keeps track of failure reasons separately from the ciEnv.
......
......@@ -1148,6 +1148,9 @@ class Compile : public Phase {
// graph is strongly connected from root in both directions.
void verify_graph_edges(bool no_dead_code = false) PRODUCT_RETURN;
// Verify GC barrier patterns
void verify_barriers() PRODUCT_RETURN;
// End-of-run dumps.
static void print_statistics() PRODUCT_RETURN;
......
......@@ -1964,7 +1964,7 @@ void PhaseIdealLoop::do_range_check( IdealLoopTree *loop, Node_List &old_new ) {
// Find loads off the surviving projection; remove their control edge
for (DUIterator_Fast imax, i = dp->fast_outs(imax); i < imax; i++) {
Node* cd = dp->fast_out(i); // Control-dependent node
if( cd->is_Load() ) { // Loads can now float around in the loop
if (cd->is_Load() && cd->depends_only_on_test()) { // Loads can now float around in the loop
// Allow the load to float around in the loop, or before it
// but NOT before the pre-loop.
_igvn.replace_input_of(cd, 0, ctrl); // ctrl, not NULL
......
......@@ -204,6 +204,17 @@ public:
protected:
const Type* load_array_final_field(const TypeKlassPtr *tkls,
ciKlass* klass) const;
// depends_only_on_test is almost always true, and needs to be almost always
// true to enable key hoisting & commoning optimizations. However, for the
// special case of RawPtr loads from TLS top & end, and other loads performed by
// GC barriers, the control edge carries the dependence preventing hoisting past
// a Safepoint instead of the memory edge. (An unfortunate consequence of having
// Safepoints not set Raw Memory; itself an unfortunate consequence of having Nodes
// which produce results (new raw memory state) inside of loops preventing all
// manner of other optimizations). Basically, it's ugly but so is the alternative.
// See comment in macro.cpp, around line 125 expand_allocate_common().
virtual bool depends_only_on_test() const { return adr_type() != TypeRawPtr::BOTTOM; }
};
//------------------------------LoadBNode--------------------------------------
......@@ -370,16 +381,6 @@ public:
virtual uint ideal_reg() const { return Op_RegP; }
virtual int store_Opcode() const { return Op_StoreP; }
virtual BasicType memory_type() const { return T_ADDRESS; }
// depends_only_on_test is almost always true, and needs to be almost always
// true to enable key hoisting & commoning optimizations. However, for the
// special case of RawPtr loads from TLS top & end, the control edge carries
// the dependence preventing hoisting past a Safepoint instead of the memory
// edge. (An unfortunate consequence of having Safepoints not set Raw
// Memory; itself an unfortunate consequence of having Nodes which produce
// results (new raw memory state) inside of loops preventing all manner of
// other optimizations). Basically, it's ugly but so is the alternative.
// See comment in macro.cpp, around line 125 expand_allocate_common().
virtual bool depends_only_on_test() const { return adr_type() != TypeRawPtr::BOTTOM; }
};
......@@ -393,16 +394,6 @@ public:
virtual uint ideal_reg() const { return Op_RegN; }
virtual int store_Opcode() const { return Op_StoreN; }
virtual BasicType memory_type() const { return T_NARROWOOP; }
// depends_only_on_test is almost always true, and needs to be almost always
// true to enable key hoisting & commoning optimizations. However, for the
// special case of RawPtr loads from TLS top & end, the control edge carries
// the dependence preventing hoisting past a Safepoint instead of the memory
// edge. (An unfortunate consequence of having Safepoints not set Raw
// Memory; itself an unfortunate consequence of having Nodes which produce
// results (new raw memory state) inside of loops preventing all manner of
// other optimizations). Basically, it's ugly but so is the alternative.
// See comment in macro.cpp, around line 125 expand_allocate_common().
virtual bool depends_only_on_test() const { return adr_type() != TypeRawPtr::BOTTOM; }
};
//------------------------------LoadKlassNode----------------------------------
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册