提交 86725edc 编写于 作者: R rasbold

8043354: OptimizePtrCompare too aggressive when allocations are present

Summary: In bcEscapeAnalyzer update the _allocated_escapes flag if a var escapes the method.
Reviewed-by: kvn
上级 6172a8bc
......@@ -158,6 +158,9 @@ void BCEscapeAnalyzer::clear_bits(ArgumentMap vars, VectorSet &bm) {
void BCEscapeAnalyzer::set_method_escape(ArgumentMap vars) {
clear_bits(vars, _arg_local);
if (vars.contains_allocated()) {
_allocated_escapes = true;
}
}
void BCEscapeAnalyzer::set_global_escape(ArgumentMap vars, bool merge) {
......
/*
* Copyright 2014 Google, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
* DO NOT ALTER OR REMOVE COPYRIGHT NOTICES OR THIS FILE HEADER.
*
* This code is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
* under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 only, as
* published by the Free Software Foundation.
*
* This code is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT
* ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or
* FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License
* version 2 for more details (a copy is included in the LICENSE file that
* accompanied this code).
*
* You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License version
* 2 along with this work; if not, write to the Free Software Foundation,
* Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA.
*
* Please contact Oracle, 500 Oracle Parkway, Redwood Shores, CA 94065 USA
* or visit www.oracle.com if you need additional information or have any
* questions.
*/
/*
* @test
* @bug 8043354
* @summary bcEscapeAnalyzer allocated_escapes not conservative enough
* @run main/othervm -XX:CompileOnly=.visitAndPop TestAllocatedEscapesPtrComparison
* @author Chuck Rasbold rasbold@google.com
*/
/*
* Test always passes with -XX:-OptmimizePtrCompare
*/
import java.util.ArrayList;
import java.util.List;
public class TestAllocatedEscapesPtrComparison {
static TestAllocatedEscapesPtrComparison dummy;
class Marker {
}
List<Marker> markerList = new ArrayList<>();
// Suppress compilation of this method, it must be processed
// by the bytecode escape analyzer.
// Make a new marker and put it on the List
Marker getMarker() {
// result escapes through markerList
final Marker result = new Marker();
markerList.add(result);
return result;
}
void visit(int depth) {
// Make a new marker
getMarker();
// Call visitAndPop every once in a while
// Cap the depth of our recursive visits
if (depth % 10 == 2) {
visitAndPop(depth + 1);
} else if (depth < 15) {
visit(depth + 1);
}
}
void visitAndPop(int depth) {
// Random dummy allocation to force EscapeAnalysis to process this method
dummy = new TestAllocatedEscapesPtrComparison();
// Make a new marker
Marker marker = getMarker();
visit(depth + 1);
// Walk and pop the marker list up to the current marker
boolean found = false;
for (int i = markerList.size() - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
Marker removed = markerList.remove(i);
// In the failure, EA mistakenly converts this comparison to false
if (removed == marker) {
found = true;
break;
}
}
if (!found) {
throw new RuntimeException("test fails");
}
}
public static void main(String args[]) {
TestAllocatedEscapesPtrComparison tc = new TestAllocatedEscapesPtrComparison();
// Warmup and run enough times
for (int i = 0; i < 20000; i++) {
tc.visit(0);
}
}
}
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册