提交 81dec77d 编写于 作者: K kvn

6975078: assert(allocated_on_res_area() || allocated_on_C_heap() || allocated_on_arena()

Summary: Pass the check in ResourceObj() if _allocation value is already set and object is allocated on stack.
Reviewed-by: dholmes, johnc
上级 39cb65bf
......@@ -158,13 +158,18 @@ CollectionSetChooser::CollectionSetChooser() :
// The line below is the worst bit of C++ hackery I've ever written
// (Detlefs, 11/23). You should think of it as equivalent to
// "_regions(100, true)": initialize the growable array and inform it
// that it should allocate its elem array(s) on the C heap. The first
// argument, however, is actually a comma expression (new-expr, 100).
// The purpose of the new_expr is to inform the growable array that it
// is *already* allocated on the C heap: it uses the placement syntax to
// keep it from actually doing any allocation.
_markedRegions((ResourceObj::operator new (sizeof(GrowableArray<HeapRegion*>),
(void*)&_markedRegions,
// that it should allocate its elem array(s) on the C heap.
//
// The first argument, however, is actually a comma expression
// (set_allocation_type(this, C_HEAP), 100). The purpose of the
// set_allocation_type() call is to replace the default allocation
// type for embedded objects STACK_OR_EMBEDDED with C_HEAP. It will
// allow to pass the assert in GenericGrowableArray() which checks
// that a growable array object must be on C heap if elements are.
//
// Note: containing object is allocated on C heap since it is CHeapObj.
//
_markedRegions((ResourceObj::set_allocation_type((address)&_markedRegions,
ResourceObj::C_HEAP),
100),
true),
......
......@@ -42,14 +42,19 @@ HeapRegionSeq::HeapRegionSeq(const size_t max_size) :
// The line below is the worst bit of C++ hackery I've ever written
// (Detlefs, 11/23). You should think of it as equivalent to
// "_regions(100, true)": initialize the growable array and inform it
// that it should allocate its elem array(s) on the C heap. The first
// argument, however, is actually a comma expression (new-expr, 100).
// The purpose of the new_expr is to inform the growable array that it
// is *already* allocated on the C heap: it uses the placement syntax to
// keep it from actually doing any allocation.
_regions((ResourceObj::operator new (sizeof(GrowableArray<HeapRegion*>),
(void*)&_regions,
ResourceObj::C_HEAP),
// that it should allocate its elem array(s) on the C heap.
//
// The first argument, however, is actually a comma expression
// (set_allocation_type(this, C_HEAP), 100). The purpose of the
// set_allocation_type() call is to replace the default allocation
// type for embedded objects STACK_OR_EMBEDDED with C_HEAP. It will
// allow to pass the assert in GenericGrowableArray() which checks
// that a growable array object must be on C heap if elements are.
//
// Note: containing object is allocated on C heap since it is CHeapObj.
//
_regions((ResourceObj::set_allocation_type((address)&_regions,
ResourceObj::C_HEAP),
(int)max_size),
true),
_next_rr_candidate(0),
......
......@@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ void* ResourceObj::operator new(size_t size, allocation_type type) {
DEBUG_ONLY(set_allocation_type(res, C_HEAP);)
break;
case RESOURCE_AREA:
// Will set allocation type in the resource object.
// new(size) sets allocation type RESOURCE_AREA.
res = (address)operator new(size);
break;
default:
......@@ -66,26 +66,30 @@ void ResourceObj::operator delete(void* p) {
void ResourceObj::set_allocation_type(address res, allocation_type type) {
// Set allocation type in the resource object
uintptr_t allocation = (uintptr_t)res;
assert((allocation & allocation_mask) == 0, "address should be aligned ot 4 bytes at least");
assert((allocation & allocation_mask) == 0, "address should be aligned to 4 bytes at least");
assert(type <= allocation_mask, "incorrect allocation type");
((ResourceObj *)res)->_allocation = ~(allocation + type);
}
ResourceObj::allocation_type ResourceObj::get_allocation_type() {
ResourceObj::allocation_type ResourceObj::get_allocation_type() const {
assert(~(_allocation | allocation_mask) == (uintptr_t)this, "lost resource object");
return (allocation_type)((~_allocation) & allocation_mask);
}
ResourceObj::ResourceObj() { // default construtor
ResourceObj::ResourceObj() { // default constructor
if (~(_allocation | allocation_mask) != (uintptr_t)this) {
set_allocation_type((address)this, STACK_OR_EMBEDDED);
} else if (allocated_on_stack()) {
// For some reason we got a value which looks like an allocation on stack.
// Pass if it is really allocated on stack.
assert(Thread::current()->on_local_stack((address)this),"should be on stack");
} else {
assert(allocated_on_res_area() || allocated_on_C_heap() || allocated_on_arena(),
"allocation_type should be set by operator new()");
}
}
ResourceObj::ResourceObj(const ResourceObj& r) { // default copy construtor
ResourceObj::ResourceObj(const ResourceObj& r) { // default copy constructor
// Used in ClassFileParser::parse_constant_pool_entries() for ClassFileStream.
set_allocation_type((address)this, STACK_OR_EMBEDDED);
}
......@@ -98,8 +102,9 @@ ResourceObj& ResourceObj::operator=(const ResourceObj& r) { // default copy assi
}
ResourceObj::~ResourceObj() {
if (!allocated_on_C_heap()) { // operator delete() checks C_heap allocation_type.
_allocation = badHeapOopVal;
// allocated_on_C_heap() also checks that encoded (in _allocation) address == this.
if (!allocated_on_C_heap()) { // ResourceObj::delete() zaps _allocation for C_heap.
_allocation = badHeapOopVal; // zap type
}
}
#endif // ASSERT
......
......@@ -317,6 +317,7 @@ extern void resource_free_bytes( char *old, size_t size );
class ResourceObj ALLOCATION_SUPER_CLASS_SPEC {
public:
enum allocation_type { STACK_OR_EMBEDDED = 0, RESOURCE_AREA, C_HEAP, ARENA, allocation_mask = 0x3 };
static void set_allocation_type(address res, allocation_type type) NOT_DEBUG_RETURN;
#ifdef ASSERT
private:
// When this object is allocated on stack the new() operator is not
......@@ -324,12 +325,11 @@ class ResourceObj ALLOCATION_SUPER_CLASS_SPEC {
// Store negated 'this' pointer when new() is called to distinguish cases.
uintptr_t _allocation;
public:
static void set_allocation_type(address res, allocation_type type);
allocation_type get_allocation_type();
bool allocated_on_stack() { return get_allocation_type() == STACK_OR_EMBEDDED; }
bool allocated_on_res_area() { return get_allocation_type() == RESOURCE_AREA; }
bool allocated_on_C_heap() { return get_allocation_type() == C_HEAP; }
bool allocated_on_arena() { return get_allocation_type() == ARENA; }
allocation_type get_allocation_type() const;
bool allocated_on_stack() const { return get_allocation_type() == STACK_OR_EMBEDDED; }
bool allocated_on_res_area() const { return get_allocation_type() == RESOURCE_AREA; }
bool allocated_on_C_heap() const { return get_allocation_type() == C_HEAP; }
bool allocated_on_arena() const { return get_allocation_type() == ARENA; }
ResourceObj(); // default construtor
ResourceObj(const ResourceObj& r); // default copy construtor
ResourceObj& operator=(const ResourceObj& r); // default copy assignment
......@@ -348,11 +348,6 @@ class ResourceObj ALLOCATION_SUPER_CLASS_SPEC {
DEBUG_ONLY(set_allocation_type(res, RESOURCE_AREA);)
return res;
}
void* operator new(size_t size, void* where, allocation_type type) {
address res = (address)where;
DEBUG_ONLY(set_allocation_type(res, type);)
return res;
}
void operator delete(void* p);
};
......
......@@ -807,7 +807,7 @@ bool Thread::is_in_stack(address adr) const {
// should be revisited, and they should be removed if possible.
bool Thread::is_lock_owned(address adr) const {
return (_stack_base >= adr && adr >= (_stack_base - _stack_size));
return on_local_stack(adr);
}
bool Thread::set_as_starting_thread() {
......
......@@ -449,6 +449,11 @@ public:
void set_stack_size(size_t size) { _stack_size = size; }
void record_stack_base_and_size();
bool on_local_stack(address adr) const {
/* QQQ this has knowledge of direction, ought to be a stack method */
return (_stack_base >= adr && adr >= (_stack_base - _stack_size));
}
int lgrp_id() const { return _lgrp_id; }
void set_lgrp_id(int value) { _lgrp_id = value; }
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册