提交 761f8145 编写于 作者: K kbarrett

8078023: verify_no_cset_oops found reclaimed humongous object in SATB buffer

Summary: Removed no longer valid checking of SATB buffers
Reviewed-by: jmasa, pliden
上级 de354854
......@@ -3059,9 +3059,7 @@ ConcurrentMark::claim_region(uint worker_id) {
#ifndef PRODUCT
enum VerifyNoCSetOopsPhase {
VerifyNoCSetOopsStack,
VerifyNoCSetOopsQueues,
VerifyNoCSetOopsSATBCompleted,
VerifyNoCSetOopsSATBThread
VerifyNoCSetOopsQueues
};
class VerifyNoCSetOopsClosure : public OopClosure, public ObjectClosure {
......@@ -3074,8 +3072,6 @@ private:
switch (_phase) {
case VerifyNoCSetOopsStack: return "Stack";
case VerifyNoCSetOopsQueues: return "Queue";
case VerifyNoCSetOopsSATBCompleted: return "Completed SATB Buffers";
case VerifyNoCSetOopsSATBThread: return "Thread SATB Buffers";
default: ShouldNotReachHere();
}
return NULL;
......@@ -3102,7 +3098,7 @@ public:
virtual void do_oop(narrowOop* p) {
// We should not come across narrow oops while scanning marking
// stacks and SATB buffers.
// stacks
ShouldNotReachHere();
}
......@@ -3111,10 +3107,7 @@ public:
}
};
void ConcurrentMark::verify_no_cset_oops(bool verify_stacks,
bool verify_enqueued_buffers,
bool verify_thread_buffers,
bool verify_fingers) {
void ConcurrentMark::verify_no_cset_oops() {
assert(SafepointSynchronize::is_at_safepoint(), "should be at a safepoint");
if (!G1CollectedHeap::heap()->mark_in_progress()) {
return;
......@@ -3122,65 +3115,47 @@ void ConcurrentMark::verify_no_cset_oops(bool verify_stacks,
VerifyNoCSetOopsClosure cl;
if (verify_stacks) {
// Verify entries on the global mark stack
cl.set_phase(VerifyNoCSetOopsStack);
_markStack.oops_do(&cl);
// Verify entries on the global mark stack
cl.set_phase(VerifyNoCSetOopsStack);
_markStack.oops_do(&cl);
// Verify entries on the task queues
for (uint i = 0; i < _max_worker_id; i += 1) {
cl.set_phase(VerifyNoCSetOopsQueues, i);
CMTaskQueue* queue = _task_queues->queue(i);
queue->oops_do(&cl);
}
}
SATBMarkQueueSet& satb_qs = JavaThread::satb_mark_queue_set();
// Verify entries on the enqueued SATB buffers
if (verify_enqueued_buffers) {
cl.set_phase(VerifyNoCSetOopsSATBCompleted);
satb_qs.iterate_completed_buffers_read_only(&cl);
}
// Verify entries on the per-thread SATB buffers
if (verify_thread_buffers) {
cl.set_phase(VerifyNoCSetOopsSATBThread);
satb_qs.iterate_thread_buffers_read_only(&cl);
}
if (verify_fingers) {
// Verify the global finger
HeapWord* global_finger = finger();
if (global_finger != NULL && global_finger < _heap_end) {
// The global finger always points to a heap region boundary. We
// use heap_region_containing_raw() to get the containing region
// given that the global finger could be pointing to a free region
// which subsequently becomes continues humongous. If that
// happens, heap_region_containing() will return the bottom of the
// corresponding starts humongous region and the check below will
// not hold any more.
// Since we always iterate over all regions, we might get a NULL HeapRegion
// here.
HeapRegion* global_hr = _g1h->heap_region_containing_raw(global_finger);
guarantee(global_hr == NULL || global_finger == global_hr->bottom(),
err_msg("global finger: "PTR_FORMAT" region: "HR_FORMAT,
p2i(global_finger), HR_FORMAT_PARAMS(global_hr)));
}
// Verify the task fingers
assert(parallel_marking_threads() <= _max_worker_id, "sanity");
for (int i = 0; i < (int) parallel_marking_threads(); i += 1) {
CMTask* task = _tasks[i];
HeapWord* task_finger = task->finger();
if (task_finger != NULL && task_finger < _heap_end) {
// See above note on the global finger verification.
HeapRegion* task_hr = _g1h->heap_region_containing_raw(task_finger);
guarantee(task_hr == NULL || task_finger == task_hr->bottom() ||
!task_hr->in_collection_set(),
err_msg("task finger: "PTR_FORMAT" region: "HR_FORMAT,
p2i(task_finger), HR_FORMAT_PARAMS(task_hr)));
}
// Verify entries on the task queues
for (uint i = 0; i < _max_worker_id; i += 1) {
cl.set_phase(VerifyNoCSetOopsQueues, i);
CMTaskQueue* queue = _task_queues->queue(i);
queue->oops_do(&cl);
}
// Verify the global finger
HeapWord* global_finger = finger();
if (global_finger != NULL && global_finger < _heap_end) {
// The global finger always points to a heap region boundary. We
// use heap_region_containing_raw() to get the containing region
// given that the global finger could be pointing to a free region
// which subsequently becomes continues humongous. If that
// happens, heap_region_containing() will return the bottom of the
// corresponding starts humongous region and the check below will
// not hold any more.
// Since we always iterate over all regions, we might get a NULL HeapRegion
// here.
HeapRegion* global_hr = _g1h->heap_region_containing_raw(global_finger);
guarantee(global_hr == NULL || global_finger == global_hr->bottom(),
err_msg("global finger: "PTR_FORMAT" region: "HR_FORMAT,
p2i(global_finger), HR_FORMAT_PARAMS(global_hr)));
}
// Verify the task fingers
assert(parallel_marking_threads() <= _max_worker_id, "sanity");
for (int i = 0; i < (int) parallel_marking_threads(); i += 1) {
CMTask* task = _tasks[i];
HeapWord* task_finger = task->finger();
if (task_finger != NULL && task_finger < _heap_end) {
// See above note on the global finger verification.
HeapRegion* task_hr = _g1h->heap_region_containing_raw(task_finger);
guarantee(task_hr == NULL || task_finger == task_hr->bottom() ||
!task_hr->in_collection_set(),
err_msg("task finger: "PTR_FORMAT" region: "HR_FORMAT,
p2i(task_finger), HR_FORMAT_PARAMS(task_hr)));
}
}
}
......
......@@ -793,14 +793,9 @@ public:
}
// Verify that there are no CSet oops on the stacks (taskqueues /
// global mark stack), enqueued SATB buffers, per-thread SATB
// buffers, and fingers (global / per-task). The boolean parameters
// decide which of the above data structures to verify. If marking
// is not in progress, it's a no-op.
void verify_no_cset_oops(bool verify_stacks,
bool verify_enqueued_buffers,
bool verify_thread_buffers,
bool verify_fingers) PRODUCT_RETURN;
// global mark stack) and fingers (global / per-task).
// If marking is not in progress, it's a no-op.
void verify_no_cset_oops() PRODUCT_RETURN;
bool isPrevMarked(oop p) const {
assert(p != NULL && p->is_oop(), "expected an oop");
......
......@@ -4093,14 +4093,9 @@ G1CollectedHeap::do_collection_pause_at_safepoint(double target_pause_time_ms) {
assert(check_cset_fast_test(), "Inconsistency in the InCSetState table.");
_cm->note_start_of_gc();
// We should not verify the per-thread SATB buffers given that
// we have not filtered them yet (we'll do so during the
// GC). We also call this after finalize_cset() to
// We call this after finalize_cset() to
// ensure that the CSet has been finalized.
_cm->verify_no_cset_oops(true /* verify_stacks */,
true /* verify_enqueued_buffers */,
false /* verify_thread_buffers */,
true /* verify_fingers */);
_cm->verify_no_cset_oops();
if (_hr_printer.is_active()) {
HeapRegion* hr = g1_policy()->collection_set();
......@@ -4123,16 +4118,6 @@ G1CollectedHeap::do_collection_pause_at_safepoint(double target_pause_time_ms) {
// Actually do the work...
evacuate_collection_set(evacuation_info);
// We do this to mainly verify the per-thread SATB buffers
// (which have been filtered by now) since we didn't verify
// them earlier. No point in re-checking the stacks / enqueued
// buffers given that the CSet has not changed since last time
// we checked.
_cm->verify_no_cset_oops(false /* verify_stacks */,
false /* verify_enqueued_buffers */,
true /* verify_thread_buffers */,
true /* verify_fingers */);
free_collection_set(g1_policy()->collection_set(), evacuation_info);
eagerly_reclaim_humongous_regions();
......@@ -4215,10 +4200,7 @@ G1CollectedHeap::do_collection_pause_at_safepoint(double target_pause_time_ms) {
// We redo the verification but now wrt to the new CSet which
// has just got initialized after the previous CSet was freed.
_cm->verify_no_cset_oops(true /* verify_stacks */,
true /* verify_enqueued_buffers */,
true /* verify_thread_buffers */,
true /* verify_fingers */);
_cm->verify_no_cset_oops();
_cm->note_end_of_gc();
// This timing is only used by the ergonomics to handle our pause target.
......
......@@ -182,12 +182,6 @@ bool ObjPtrQueue::should_enqueue_buffer() {
return should_enqueue;
}
void ObjPtrQueue::apply_closure(ObjectClosure* cl) {
if (_buf != NULL) {
apply_closure_to_buffer(cl, _buf, _index, _sz);
}
}
void ObjPtrQueue::apply_closure_and_empty(ObjectClosure* cl) {
if (_buf != NULL) {
apply_closure_to_buffer(cl, _buf, _index, _sz);
......@@ -319,28 +313,6 @@ bool SATBMarkQueueSet::apply_closure_to_completed_buffer(ObjectClosure* cl) {
}
}
void SATBMarkQueueSet::iterate_completed_buffers_read_only(ObjectClosure* cl) {
assert(SafepointSynchronize::is_at_safepoint(), "Must be at safepoint.");
assert(cl != NULL, "pre-condition");
BufferNode* nd = _completed_buffers_head;
while (nd != NULL) {
void** buf = BufferNode::make_buffer_from_node(nd);
ObjPtrQueue::apply_closure_to_buffer(cl, buf, 0, _sz);
nd = nd->next();
}
}
void SATBMarkQueueSet::iterate_thread_buffers_read_only(ObjectClosure* cl) {
assert(SafepointSynchronize::is_at_safepoint(), "Must be at safepoint.");
assert(cl != NULL, "pre-condition");
for (JavaThread* t = Threads::first(); t; t = t->next()) {
t->satb_mark_queue().apply_closure(cl);
}
shared_satb_queue()->apply_closure(cl);
}
#ifndef PRODUCT
// Helpful for debugging
......
......@@ -41,9 +41,6 @@ private:
// Filter out unwanted entries from the buffer.
void filter();
// Apply the closure to all elements.
void apply_closure(ObjectClosure* cl);
// Apply the closure to all elements and empty the buffer;
void apply_closure_and_empty(ObjectClosure* cl);
......@@ -105,12 +102,6 @@ public:
// completed buffers exist, return false.
bool apply_closure_to_completed_buffer(ObjectClosure* closure);
// Apply the given closure on enqueued and currently-active buffers
// respectively. Both methods are read-only, i.e., they do not
// modify any of the buffers.
void iterate_completed_buffers_read_only(ObjectClosure* cl);
void iterate_thread_buffers_read_only(ObjectClosure* cl);
#ifndef PRODUCT
// Helpful for debugging
void print_all(const char* msg);
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册