提交 3a0b1552 编写于 作者: G goetz

8028401: PPC (part 117): Improve usability of adlc and format() functionality.

Summary: Add additional, more verbose syntax checks in adlc. Fix printing constant's problem in format().
Reviewed-by: kvn
上级 f2ffd37f
......@@ -3996,13 +3996,11 @@ void ADLParser::effect_parse(InstructForm *instr) {
//------------------------------expand_parse-----------------------------------
ExpandRule* ADLParser::expand_parse(InstructForm *instr) {
char *ident, *ident2;
OperandForm *oper;
InstructForm *ins;
NameAndList *instr_and_operands = NULL;
ExpandRule *exp = new ExpandRule();
// Expand is a block containing an ordered list of instructions, each of
// which has an ordered list of operands.
// Expand is a block containing an ordered list of operands with initializers,
// or instructions, each of which has an ordered list of operands.
// Check for block delimiter
skipws(); // Skip leading whitespace
if ((_curchar != '%')
......@@ -4016,12 +4014,30 @@ ExpandRule* ADLParser::expand_parse(InstructForm *instr) {
if (ident == NULL) {
parse_err(SYNERR, "identifier expected at %c\n", _curchar);
continue;
} // Check that you have a valid instruction
}
// Check whether we should parse an instruction or operand.
const Form *form = _globalNames[ident];
ins = form ? form->is_instruction() : NULL;
if (ins == NULL) {
bool parse_oper = false;
bool parse_ins = false;
if (form == NULL) {
skipws();
// Check whether this looks like an instruction specification. If so,
// just parse the instruction. The declaration of the instruction is
// not needed here.
if (_curchar == '(') parse_ins = true;
} else if (form->is_instruction()) {
parse_ins = true;
} else if (form->is_operand()) {
parse_oper = true;
} else {
parse_err(SYNERR, "instruction/operand name expected at %s\n", ident);
continue;
}
if (parse_oper) {
// This is a new operand
oper = form ? form->is_operand() : NULL;
OperandForm *oper = form->is_operand();
if (oper == NULL) {
parse_err(SYNERR, "instruction/operand name expected at %s\n", ident);
continue;
......@@ -4056,6 +4072,7 @@ ExpandRule* ADLParser::expand_parse(InstructForm *instr) {
skipws();
}
else {
assert(parse_ins, "sanity");
// Add instruction to list
instr_and_operands = new NameAndList(ident);
// Grab operands, build nameList of them, and then put into dictionary
......@@ -4079,7 +4096,7 @@ ExpandRule* ADLParser::expand_parse(InstructForm *instr) {
parse_err(SYNERR, "operand name expected at %s\n", ident2);
continue;
}
oper = form2->is_operand();
OperandForm *oper = form2->is_operand();
if (oper == NULL && !form2->is_opclass()) {
parse_err(SYNERR, "operand name expected at %s\n", ident2);
continue;
......
......@@ -1276,11 +1276,11 @@ void InstructForm::rep_var_format(FILE *fp, const char *rep_var) {
return;
}
if (strcmp(rep_var, "constantoffset") == 0) {
fprintf(fp, "st->print(\"#%%d\", constant_offset());\n");
fprintf(fp, "st->print(\"#%%d\", constant_offset_unchecked());\n");
return;
}
if (strcmp(rep_var, "constantaddress") == 0) {
fprintf(fp, "st->print(\"constant table base + #%%d\", constant_offset());\n");
fprintf(fp, "st->print(\"constant table base + #%%d\", constant_offset_unchecked());\n");
return;
}
......
......@@ -1570,6 +1570,13 @@ void ArchDesc::defineExpand(FILE *fp, InstructForm *node) {
new_id = expand_instr->name();
InstructForm* expand_instruction = (InstructForm*)globalAD->globalNames()[new_id];
if (!expand_instruction) {
globalAD->syntax_err(node->_linenum, "In %s: instruction %s used in expand not declared\n",
node->_ident, new_id);
continue;
}
if (expand_instruction->has_temps()) {
globalAD->syntax_err(node->_linenum, "In %s: expand rules using instructs with TEMPs aren't supported: %s",
node->_ident, new_id);
......@@ -1628,6 +1635,13 @@ void ArchDesc::defineExpand(FILE *fp, InstructForm *node) {
// Use 'parameter' at current position in list of new instruction's formals
// instead of 'opid' when looking up info internal to new_inst
const char *parameter = formal_lst->iter();
if (!parameter) {
globalAD->syntax_err(node->_linenum, "Operand %s of expand instruction %s has"
" no equivalent in new instruction %s.",
opid, node->_ident, new_inst->_ident);
assert(0, "Wrong expand");
}
// Check for an operand which is created in the expand rule
if ((exp_pos = node->_exprule->_newopers.index(opid)) != -1) {
new_pos = new_inst->operand_position(parameter,Component::USE);
......@@ -2103,16 +2117,21 @@ public:
if (strcmp(rep_var,"$reg") == 0 || reg_conversion(rep_var) != NULL) {
_reg_status = LITERAL_ACCESSED;
} else {
_AD.syntax_err(_encoding._linenum,
"Invalid access to literal register parameter '%s' in %s.\n",
rep_var, _encoding._name);
assert( false, "invalid access to literal register parameter");
}
}
// literal constant parameters must be accessed as a 'constant' field
if ( _constant_status != LITERAL_NOT_SEEN ) {
assert( _constant_status == LITERAL_SEEN, "Must have seen constant literal before now");
if( strcmp(rep_var,"$constant") == 0 ) {
_constant_status = LITERAL_ACCESSED;
if (_constant_status != LITERAL_NOT_SEEN) {
assert(_constant_status == LITERAL_SEEN, "Must have seen constant literal before now");
if (strcmp(rep_var,"$constant") == 0) {
_constant_status = LITERAL_ACCESSED;
} else {
assert( false, "invalid access to literal constant parameter");
_AD.syntax_err(_encoding._linenum,
"Invalid access to literal constant parameter '%s' in %s.\n",
rep_var, _encoding._name);
}
}
} // end replacement and/or subfield
......
......@@ -505,6 +505,9 @@ int MachConstantNode::constant_offset() {
return _constant.offset();
}
int MachConstantNode::constant_offset_unchecked() const {
return _constant.offset();
}
//=============================================================================
#ifndef PRODUCT
......
......@@ -416,6 +416,8 @@ public:
int constant_offset();
int constant_offset() const { return ((MachConstantNode*) this)->constant_offset(); }
// Unchecked version to avoid assertions in debug output.
int constant_offset_unchecked() const;
};
//------------------------------MachUEPNode-----------------------------------
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册