Skip to content

cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel

openanolis / cloud-kernel
1 年多 前同步成功

通知 160
Star 36
Fork 7
cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 26 9月, 2011 3 次提交
  3. 22 8月, 2011 2 次提交
  5. 19 8月, 2011 1 次提交
    • I
      sparc: fix array bounds error setting up PCIC NMI trap · 4a0342ca
      由 Ian Campbell 提交于 
        CC      arch/sparc/kernel/pcic.o
arch/sparc/kernel/pcic.c: In function 'pcic_probe':
arch/sparc/kernel/pcic.c:359:33: error: array subscript is above array bounds [-Werror=array-bounds]
arch/sparc/kernel/pcic.c:359:8: error: array subscript is above array bounds [-Werror=array-bounds]
arch/sparc/kernel/pcic.c:360:33: error: array subscript is above array bounds [-Werror=array-bounds]
arch/sparc/kernel/pcic.c:360:8: error: array subscript is above array bounds [-Werror=array-bounds]
arch/sparc/kernel/pcic.c:361:33: error: array subscript is above array bounds [-Werror=array-bounds]
arch/sparc/kernel/pcic.c:361:8: error: array subscript is above array bounds [-Werror=array-bounds]
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors

I'm not particularly familiar with sparc but t_nmi (defined in head_32.S via
the TRAP_ENTRY macro) and pcic_nmi_trap_patch (defined in entry.S) both appear
to be 4 instructions long and I presume from the usage that instructions are
int sized.
Signed-off-by: NIan Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: sparclinux@vger.kernel.org
Reviewed-by: NSam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      4a0342ca
  7. 17 8月, 2011 2 次提交
    • J
      xen/x86: replace order-based range checking of M2P table by linear one · ccbcdf7c
      由 Jan Beulich 提交于 
      The order-based approach is not only less efficient (requiring a shift
and a compare, typical generated code looking like this

	mov	eax, [machine_to_phys_order]
	mov	ecx, eax
	shr	ebx, cl
	test	ebx, ebx
	jnz	...

whereas a direct check requires just a compare, like in

	cmp	ebx, [machine_to_phys_nr]
	jae	...

), but also slightly dangerous in the 32-on-64 case - the element
address calculation can wrap if the next power of two boundary is
sufficiently far away from the actual upper limit of the table, and
hence can result in user space addresses being accessed (with it being
unknown what may actually be mapped there).

Additionally, the elimination of the mistaken use of fls() here (should
have been __fls()) fixes a latent issue on x86-64 that would trigger
if the code was run on a system with memory extending beyond the 44-bit
boundary.

CC: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NJan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com>
[v1: Based on Jeremy's feedback]
Signed-off-by: NKonrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
      ccbcdf7c
    • R
      KVM: uses TASKSTATS, depends on NET · df3d8ae1
      由 Randy Dunlap 提交于 
      CONFIG_TASKSTATS just had a change to use netlink, including
a change to "depends on NET".  Since "select" does not follow
dependencies, KVM also needs to depend on NET to prevent build
errors when CONFIG_NET is not enabled.

Sample of the reported "undefined reference" build errors:

taskstats.c:(.text+0x8f686): undefined reference to `nla_put'
taskstats.c:(.text+0x8f721): undefined reference to `nla_reserve'
taskstats.c:(.text+0x8f8fb): undefined reference to `init_net'
taskstats.c:(.text+0x8f905): undefined reference to `netlink_unicast'
taskstats.c:(.text+0x8f934): undefined reference to `kfree_skb'
taskstats.c:(.text+0x8f9e9): undefined reference to `skb_clone'
taskstats.c:(.text+0x90060): undefined reference to `__alloc_skb'
taskstats.c:(.text+0x901e9): undefined reference to `skb_put'
taskstats.c:(.init.text+0x4665): undefined reference to `genl_register_family'
taskstats.c:(.init.text+0x4699): undefined reference to `genl_register_ops'
taskstats.c:(.init.text+0x4710): undefined reference to `genl_unregister_ops'
taskstats.c:(.init.text+0x471c): undefined reference to `genl_unregister_family'
Signed-off-by: NRandy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net>
Signed-off-by: NMarcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
      df3d8ae1
  9. 16 8月, 2011 4 次提交
  11. 12 8月, 2011 1 次提交
  13. 11 8月, 2011 10 次提交
  15. 10 8月, 2011 11 次提交
  17. 09 8月, 2011 5 次提交
  19. 08 8月, 2011 1 次提交